The anyone else, unfortunately for Trump, being Biden.But he has also had more people vote for him as President than almost anyone else More than twice as many as Kennedy.
Out of interest in1960 the US pop. was 179m to 333m today.
The anyone else, unfortunately for Trump, being Biden.But he has also had more people vote for him as President than almost anyone else More than twice as many as Kennedy.
Indeed.It is INSANE some of the things I see referred to as Far Left nowadays.
Indeed.
'What are you doing? '
'This lady fell over, I'm just helping her get up'
'Commie bastard!'
WOKE Commie bastard, I think you'll find...Indeed.
'What are you doing? '
'This lady fell over, I'm just helping her get up'
'Commie bastard!'
FYI Yandex is rumoured to be owned by the Russian government.Thanks.
I assume you'll contact them to correct this?
Exactly. That's why Trigaaar's comment about Trump have more votes against him, needs taking into context. It's undoubtedly true that Trump had more votes against him than any other presidential candidate, it's true that Biden had more votes against him than any candidate other than Trump, and it's totally irrelevant.The anyone else, unfortunately for Trump, being Biden.
Out of interest in1960 the US pop. was 179m to 333m today.
As has been said It's also true that Trump became President with nearly 3 million votes less than Clinton.Exactly. That's why Trigaaar's comment about Trump have more votes against him, needs taking into context. It's undoubtedly true that Trump had more votes against him than any other presidential candidate, it's true that Biden had more votes against him than any candidate other than Trump, and it's totally irrelevant.
God forbid if they ever bothered to actually read the New Testament...Indeed.
'What are you doing? '
'This lady fell over, I'm just helping her get up'
'Commie bastard!'
. What a Grade A c**t if anyone on here thought different before
Exactly. That's why Trigaaar's comment about Trump have more votes against him, needs taking into context.
It's the comment that Harris was an unpopular VP that's totally irrelevant.It's undoubtedly true that Trump had more votes against him than any other presidential candidate, it's true that Biden had more votes against him than any candidate other than Trump, and it's totally irrelevant.
Whomever she chooses, I look forward to Lasvegan telling us that it was the worst possible choice for America, and it'd be a disaster if they won.Reports now the Harris has narrowed down her VP pick to Pennsylvania's governor, Josh Shapiro, or Minnesota's governor, Tim Walz.
Announcement expected tomorrow.
it's a matter of record Harris polling as VP has been the worst in history. just didnt seem to have any presence or achieve anything of note. what should be pointed out is that despite this, she is now considered neck and neck with Trump for the presidency. she seems to have been underestimated, overshadowed by a questionable Biden, Trump is very disliked, or all of the above.No you've joined the comments part way through and jumped on my post, but mine was a response to the daft comment that Harris is the most unpopular VP since polling began.
it's a matter of record Harris polling as VP has been the worst in history
It was leaked that it would be Shapiro, a former IDF soldier. That will go down well.Reports now the Harris has narrowed down her VP pick to Pennsylvania's governor, Josh Shapiro, or Minnesota's governor, Tim Walz.
Announcement expected tomorrow.
Or the polling isn't accurate. Remember CNN with 98% chance Clinton will win?it's a matter of record Harris polling as VP has been the worst in history. just didnt seem to have any presence or achieve anything of note. what should be pointed out is that despite this, she is now considered neck and neck with Trump for the presidency. she seems to have been underestimated, overshadowed by a questionable Biden, Trump is very disliked, or all of the above.
Hillary got more actual voters though, right? perhaps the polling is off, and Harris was never as unpopular and Trump is further behind than it looks.Or the polling isn't accurate. Remember CNN with 98% chance Clinton will win?
Thats not how it usually pans out though.perhaps the polling is off, and Harris was never as unpopular and Trump is further behind than it looks.