Obviously - because he unified a nation in wartime. No other PM will ever garner cross party sentiment like that in peace time, IMO.Fair enough, my best PM ever would be Churchill
Obviously - because he unified a nation in wartime. No other PM will ever garner cross party sentiment like that in peace time, IMO.Fair enough, my best PM ever would be Churchill
What would you have done?the fiasco is the fault of bankers greed, the response to it was poor.
the fiasco is the fault of bankers greed, the response to it was poor.
accepted the bid from lloyds when they first realised there was a problemWhat would you have done?
Bof E had banking supervision taken away by gordon brownThe B of E and FSA are responsible for the monitoring of the bank, surely they screwed up more than the government. No one comes out of this smelling of roses, but to blame it solely on the government is odd.
Obviously - because he unified a nation in wartime. No other PM will ever garner cross party sentiment like that in peace time, IMO.
And why is that any better than nationalising it?accepted the bid from lloyds when they first realised there was a problem
accepted the bid from lloyds when they first realised there was a problem
Yet you blame the Northern Rock fiasco on Labour, whilst the conclusion of the report says
The fiasco has dented public confidence in the financial industry - and it's all too easy for the banks to blame the government, the regulator or the American housing market.
Indeed they seem determined to blame anything - anything, that is, except their own greed.
So, on reflection, is the Northern Rock fiasco the fault of the bankers greed or New Labour? You appear to contradict yourself.
Stamp Duty, Inheritance Tax, Robbery of Pension Funds, Mismanagement of the economy, growth based on credit and not sustainable basis, Northern Rock fiasco, lack of consumer and business confidence in this government, I could go on but they are to blame for a lot of the mess we are in.
Here it is US, I think the words NORTHERN ROCK FIASCO are yours, are they not?
cause the bid was better than anything that was on offer after they had finished dithering , and that way lloyds wouldve taken on the risk not the taxpayer.And why is that any better than nationalising it?
cause the bid was better than anything that was on offer after they had finished dithering , and that way lloyds wouldve taken on the risk not the taxpayer.
you may be right but im pretty surethat was virgin ?I don't think this is the case. According to an interview Mervin King gave to the BBC last autumn, the Lloyd's/TSB offer for Northern Rock was conditional upon them receiving a Govt/BoE loan of £30 billion loan at a "competative" (low?) rate to finance the purchase?
you may be right but im pretty surethat was virgin ?