Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

thank christ







HampshireSeagulls

Moulding Generation Z
Jul 19, 2005
5,264
Bedford
Scarface said:
Probably because he is such a bloater because his mum drives him everywhere!

Bloody school drivers. Unable to understand the etiquette of the roads, like actually using a turn-based system on roundabouts when it is busy because that is the only way anyone will get to move. Allowing people to pull out - it will cost you 15 seconds, it will not stop you getting home in time for Jerry Springer. The three point turns outside schools because they can't work out how to drive down the road and turn right three times to get back to the same place. Parking on zigzags so Johnny can step out right into the school gates - then having a ten minute conversation with him. Parking in the middle of the road and having another ten minute conversation with another mum. Braking for no reason, indicating at random, flashing headlights to say "hello" to ten cars in a fifteen metre space of road. Having conversations whilst on the move with their offspring/teacher/friend/now redundant lollipop lady. Being unable to park in a space that you could get an Armoured Personnel Carrier into. In fact, an Aircraft Carrier.

Shit 'em, not one of them has even heard of trip-sharing, walking buses, or putting the little darlings through road proficiency on cycles so they can work out that their legs are for more than folding underneath their arses when playing on the Playstation2.
 


withdeanwombat

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2005
8,731
Somersetshire
HampshireSeagulls said:
Bloody school drivers. Unable to understand the etiquette of the roads, like actually using a turn-based system on roundabouts when it is busy because that is the only way anyone will get to move. Allowing people to pull out - it will cost you 15 seconds, it will not stop you getting home in time for Jerry Springer. The three point turns outside schools because they can't work out how to drive down the road and turn right three times to get back to the same place. Parking on zigzags so Johnny can step out right into the school gates - then having a ten minute conversation with him. Parking in the middle of the road and having another ten minute conversation with another mum. Braking for no reason, indicating at random, flashing headlights to say "hello" to ten cars in a fifteen metre space of road. Having conversations whilst on the move with their offspring/teacher/friend/now redundant lollipop lady. Being unable to park in a space that you could get an Armoured Personnel Carrier into. In fact, an Aircraft Carrier.

Shit 'em, not one of them has even heard of trip-sharing, walking buses, or putting the little darlings through road proficiency on cycles so they can work out that their legs are for more than folding underneath their arses when playing on the Playstation2.

Though,having passed their test ,paid for car,tax and insurance,they have the right to drive wherever they want.If it upsets you ,tough.Its a real Bu**er driving when all those depressed wallies drift out of their offices at 5/5.30 and clag up the roads with their clapped out Cortinas and stunningly bad driving.

Walk to work,you idlers.You know it makes sense.
 


hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,769
Chandlers Ford
withdeanwombat said:
Though,having passed their test ,paid for car,tax and insurance,they have the right to drive wherever they want.If it upsets you ,tough.Its a real Bu**er driving when all those depressed wallies drift out of their offices at 5/5.30 and clag up the roads with their clapped out Cortinas and stunningly bad driving.

Walk to work,you idlers.You know it makes sense.

Oh shit. I work and have kids. I don't know where I stand in this argument and now I am all confused
 


Napper

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
24,456
Sussex
yeah damn people who drop there kids to school, no wonder the next generation are all bloaters :angry: :angry: :angry:

Get off the road and make your kids walk / cycle :angry: :angry:

and give them proper food , not chicken nuggets + chips every night :angry:

lard arses :angry:

rant over :drink:
 




Scarface

New member
Apr 16, 2004
3,044
Burgess Hill
HampshireSeagulls said:
Bloody school drivers. Unable to understand the etiquette of the roads, like actually using a turn-based system on roundabouts when it is busy because that is the only way anyone will get to move. Allowing people to pull out - it will cost you 15 seconds, it will not stop you getting home in time for Jerry Springer. The three point turns outside schools because they can't work out how to drive down the road and turn right three times to get back to the same place. Parking on zigzags so Johnny can step out right into the school gates - then having a ten minute conversation with him. Parking in the middle of the road and having another ten minute conversation with another mum. Braking for no reason, indicating at random, flashing headlights to say "hello" to ten cars in a fifteen metre space of road. Having conversations whilst on the move with their offspring/teacher/friend/now redundant lollipop lady. Being unable to park in a space that you could get an Armoured Personnel Carrier into. In fact, an Aircraft Carrier.

Dont you know that all of that is ok if they have their hazard lights on!
 


HampshireSeagulls

Moulding Generation Z
Jul 19, 2005
5,264
Bedford
withdeanwombat said:
Though,having passed their test ,paid for car,tax and insurance,they have the right to drive wherever they want.If it upsets you ,tough.Its a real Bu**er driving when all those depressed wallies drift out of their offices at 5/5.30 and clag up the roads with their clapped out Cortinas and stunningly bad driving.

Walk to work,you idlers.You know it makes sense.

Great logic. Having passed their test, paid car tax and insurance, then they have the right to drive whilst pissed out of their heads as well? Some of these people (not all women) are simply dangerous drivers, and I am assuming they are still sober at that time of the morning, although some of them could be an outside bet for being legless!

I haven't seen a clapped out Cortina for ages - but I have seen lots of poxy 4x4s, and the furthest they get off road is mounting the pavement because they can't corner properly! And almost none of them know how to engage the four wheel drive, even if they had to. Tossers, the lot of them.
 








Yorkie

Sussex born and bred
Jul 5, 2003
32,367
dahn sarf
gazwag said:

What annoys me is the lazy parents who have to drop their poor son or daughter right at the school gates when there are perfectly good places to drop off five minutes away from the school which would cause much less conjestion.

That 5 minutes away made all the difference to poor Rory Blackhall.
 






HampshireSeagulls

Moulding Generation Z
Jul 19, 2005
5,264
Bedford
Yorkie said:
That 5 minutes away made all the difference to poor Rory Blackhall.

It does make the difference, and unfortunately the percentages prove that there is a minute chance that a child may be abducted. However, the main offenders against children are family members or those that are known to the family. Do you stop your children seeing uncles/aunts, etc? Of course not. Do you stop flying on holiday because you might get hijacked/blown up? Do you stop children from playing outside - ever - because of the same potential risk? You have to make a decision based on percentages, and weigh up your choice against the other damage you could be doing - such as encouraging children into a sedentary lifestyle, increasing pollution, and adding to the risk of you running over someone else's child, also making your children scared of everything - I know children at my youngest's school who still have comfort blankets at the age of 10, children who have no concept of going to the shop at the end of the road, and children who are too frightened to play in the garden because of the case a little while back where a child was lifted over a fence. A friend of my eldest has massive scars because he was run over by a parent who was more concerned about negotiating their 4x4 through a mass of children to the closest point possible to the school gates. And the parent still tried to blame it on the child - the other parent got a slapping because they tried to grab this boy and "teach him to cross the road properly"! The police prosecuted for dangerous driving, but the boy could have died - he was dragged for 12 feet by this vehicle, and the parent had no concept of what was going on!

The best defence is to explain things honestly to your child, and prepare them the best way possible in case things go wrong. Mobile phones may be a pain, but having the ability to hold down the 9 key to call the police if they are in danger is priceless. Knowing where to run to, who to run to, and having the ability to run is important, and as a final resort, both of mine are high grade karate practitioners who have had additional training in other skills to enable them to disable almost any adult they have a problem with. Get your children into swimming classes for stamina, get them into an organised martial art for defence purposes, discipline and self-respect, and focus on what you can let them do, not what you can't.

I can't deny that 5 minutes made a difference to that poor boy's life, and the parents will have to live with not delivering him to the school gates for the rest of their lives, thinking they could have protected him, but you can't live your lives, or your childrens, by wrapping them in cotton wool for ever.
 




Scotty Mac

New member
Jul 13, 2003
24,405
HampshireSeagulls said:
It does make the difference, and unfortunately the percentages prove that there is a minute chance that a child may be abducted. However, the main offenders against children are family members or those that are known to the family. Do you stop your children seeing uncles/aunts, etc? Of course not. Do you stop flying on holiday because you might get hijacked/blown up? Do you stop children from playing outside - ever - because of the same potential risk? You have to make a decision based on percentages, and weigh up your choice against the other damage you could be doing - such as encouraging children into a sedentary lifestyle, increasing pollution, and adding to the risk of you running over someone else's child, also making your children scared of everything - I know children at my youngest's school who still have comfort blankets at the age of 10, children who have no concept of going to the shop at the end of the road, and children who are too frightened to play in the garden because of the case a little while back where a child was lifted over a fence. A friend of my eldest has massive scars because he was run over by a parent who was more concerned about negotiating their 4x4 through a mass of children to the closest point possible to the school gates. And the parent still tried to blame it on the child - the other parent got a slapping because they tried to grab this boy and "teach him to cross the road properly"! The police prosecuted for dangerous driving, but the boy could have died - he was dragged for 12 feet by this vehicle, and the parent had no concept of what was going on!

The best defence is to explain things honestly to your child, and prepare them the best way possible in case things go wrong. Mobile phones may be a pain, but having the ability to hold down the 9 key to call the police if they are in danger is priceless. Knowing where to run to, who to run to, and having the ability to run is important, and as a final resort, both of mine are high grade karate practitioners who have had additional training in other skills to enable them to disable almost any adult they have a problem with. Get your children into swimming classes for stamina, get them into an organised martial art for defence purposes, discipline and self-respect, and focus on what you can let them do, not what you can't.

I can't deny that 5 minutes made a difference to that poor boy's life, and the parents will have to live with not delivering him to the school gates for the rest of their lives, thinking they could have protected him, but you can't live your lives, or your childrens, by wrapping them in cotton wool for ever.

:clap2: :clap2: :clap2:

well said that man
 




Jul 14, 2003
892
BN2
Re: Re: Re: thank christ

withdeanwombat said:
Just paid my £170 road tax which allows me to drive les enfants to school tomorrow.

Course,I could have paid £140 for their school bus,but I'd have been doing that again next half term.And the one after that.And the next....etc.

So my highly parkable Peugeot 205 will be back on the school run,as it has every right to be.

And bad cess on those drivers who cannot hack the roads,and who constantly whinge at those doing their best for their kids.

Get a night job.
Ooooooh! Get her.
 




withdeanwombat

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2005
8,731
Somersetshire
chicken run said:
The other problem noone has mentioned is the performance tables have created a drive across town to the better schools


Sadly,not in Somerset.

Strict adherence to the criteria for entry meant that both my children had to go to the "local" school which is further away than the school their primary traditionally fed into.

All connections with friends for 6 years lost,forced to go to a school well down the league table,and told that even that place could be lost if we appealed.

Fume,fume.

But the kids said "Don't worry",and though I did, they're OK.

But I still have to use the 205 to get them to school.I'd make 'em bike it,but the trip is horrendous;country lanes used as ratruns ,blind bends etc etc.And the school bus would cost £840 for the year.

Anyway,do not be mislead into thinking that school league tables lead to choice.

Down here you have to move house to get into the "right" catchment area.

Big bucks for estate agents and solicitors,though
 


PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
19,641
Hurst Green
one of my kids goes to school 3 miles away, the other three 10 miles in the opposite direction, my wife and i drive them in our cars one a 4x4, one a mondeo (sad i know). we do actually own a farm. we also own a pub. taking this into account i drive a 4x4, am still obviously pissed from the night before and i drive my kids to school, perhaps i should be locked up for being a pain to society.
 




PILTDOWN MAN

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 15, 2004
19,641
Hurst Green
withdeanwombat said:
Sadly,not in Somerset.

Strict adherence to the criteria for entry meant that both my children had to go to the "local" school which is further away than the school their primary traditionally fed into.

All connections with friends for 6 years lost,forced to go to a school well down the league table,and told that even that place could be lost if we appealed.

Fume,fume.

But the kids said "Don't worry",and though I did, they're OK.

But I still have to use the 205 to get them to school.I'd make 'em bike it,but the trip is horrendous;country lanes used as ratruns ,blind bends etc etc.And the school bus would cost £840 for the year.

Anyway,do not be mislead into thinking that school league tables lead to choice.

Down here you have to move house to get into the "right" catchment area.

Big bucks for estate agents and solicitors,though


we nearly moved to somerset a few years ago but didn't because we couldn't get our kids into any of the schools
 


Father Jack

New member
Aug 21, 2005
1,708
Referee! said:
Yep same here, although I'll be going by train to college

I get the train too but walk 25 mins to the station in the morning. Public transport is better for the environment than everyone taking their own car.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here