[Cricket] Test Series- England in India- January & February 2024

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,934
All starts on Thursday in the early hours.

My first ever memory of TMS was the India tour of 81/82. If you weren't around for it perhaps you were fortunate. But hearing CMJ, Johners et al was the start of a love affair. I missed John Arlott by a year. If you were around for him then you are a lucky lucky bastard.

So, whilst we look at the mess we (they) call cricket these days, a series like this is an oasis in a desert of epileptic colour and gimmickry.

At the moment, I fear for England's prospects. Last series, after an incredible win in Madras, England were pummeled into meek submission. The Ahmedabad Test producing 338 runs for the loss of THIRTY wickets. Guess how many the spinners took ? The most extreme guess will only be two over...

Rumours England may go into the first Test with just one quick bowler.

My feeling is that this series could end up being equally as one sided as the last. But at least it's cricket.
 






Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
37,347
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
All starts on Thursday in the early hours.

My first ever memory of TMS was the India tour of 81/82. If you weren't around for it perhaps you were fortunate. But hearing CMJ, Johners et al was the start of a love affair. I missed John Arlott by a year. If you were around for him then you are a lucky lucky bastard.

So, whilst we look at the mess we (they) call cricket these days, a series like this is an oasis in a desert of epileptic colour and gimmickry.

At the moment, I fear for England's prospects. Last series, after an incredible win in Madras, England were pummeled into meek submission. The Ahmedabad Test producing 338 runs for the loss of THIRTY wickets. Guess how many the spinners took ? The most extreme guess will only be two over...

Rumours England may go into the first Test with just one quick bowler.

My feeling is that this series could end up being equally as one sided as the last. But at least it's cricket.
Well they won’t go into it with Bashir playing because our team is now being picked by Indian immigration. I shouldn’t complain. We basically taught them all this shit.

Looking forward to this, but not as much as two of my mates who have probably just landed in Hyderabad. To say I’m jealous is an understatement.
 




Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,934
I'm in Hyderabad at the moment where it's 3.15am having just watched our U-21s beat Swansea 1-0 on YouTube.
Time to get my head down.
We expect LOTS of pics.

Now got to bed.
 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,556
Deepest, darkest Sussex




Javeaseagull

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 22, 2014
2,829
When South Africa wouldn’t allow one of players to tour we called it off. No chance of that happening nowadays I suppose. Too much money running on it, of course, but not even a mention pisses me off.
 






Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,934
Piece of trivia. Which umpire, who stood in two World Cup Finals, also scored a goal against Manchester United in a shock FA Cup win ?
 














Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,934


Is it PotG?

Thrifty non-licker
Feb 20, 2017
25,479
Sussex by the Sea
Uncapped Lancashire left-armer Tom Hartley, 24, will make his England debut in the first Test in India, which begins on Thursday in Hyderabad.

Hartley, who has taken 40 wickets in 20 first-class matches, is one of three specialist spinners named in the XI.

Rehan Ahmed, 19, and Jack Leach are both involved, with Mark Wood the only fast bowler.
 


A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,556
Deepest, darkest Sussex
That’ll be fun when Mark Wood breaks down after four overs
 






hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,763
Chandlers Ford
That's a ballsy selection that's for sure. Surely you would want a bowler who doesn't have an awful injury record as the only quicker option
Seems an insane decision, tbh.

Not only the risk that he breaks down in this Test, but the risk to his longer term fitness, from over-bowling him. That or they risk Stokes' knee by trying to squeeze a few overs out of him.

The team is incredibly unbalanced in that regard - partly because the 'part time skills' of the batters they've chosen do not include any seam bowling (save for the injured Stokes). A Collingwood, or even a Trott (or Harry Brook) would have helped a little.

By my reckoning they have chosen:

FOUR (specialist or occasional) wicket-keepers, in Foakes, Bairstow, Pope and Duckett
SIX (specialist or occasional) spinners, in Leach, Ahmed, Hartley, Root, Crawley (R Off), Duckett (R Leg)
ONE fit seamer, in Mark Wood.

Bizarre
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top