Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

team v Leeds







GolfingGull

Active member
Jul 21, 2013
588
Costa del Worthing
---------------Stockdale---------------

Calderon--Dunk--Hughes--Bennett

-------------Kayal---Ince-------------

---Ledesma------Tex---------LuaLua---

----------------Baldock------------------
 




Zebedee

Anyone seen Florence?
Jul 8, 2003
8,053
Hangleton
Best is Best. You know it makes sense, especially in Hughton's eyes.
 






brightonmark1234

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2010
8,351
Worthing
If they are all fit start with the same 11. Best needs to be given a bit of a run to see if he can produce, it is tough being the lone striker. However time is running out for him. He is a bit more mobile than COG and put balls in from wide for advancing midfield men. However if he does not come off I think COG will be back for the next away trip.

CH has decided Holla and JFC are not in his long term plans (for this division at least)
i would leave best on the bench hes been poor in the recent games he has started and its like playing with 10 men when he does
 


saafend_seagull

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
14,022
BN1
---------------Stockdale---------------

Bruno--Dunk--Greer--Bennett

-------------Kayal---Ince-------------

---Calderon----Tex-------Ledesma---

----------------Baldock------------------
 






GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,205
Gloucester
Difficult to justify changing a winning team.

But - maybe:
Hughes for Greer;
Ledesma (if fit) for Calderon (very tough on Calde after his goal scoring exploits, so maybe play Calde at RB instead of Bruno, or start with Calde at RM and bring on Ledesma later for game time);
COG for Best (unlikely; we may have to accept that Best is now the new JFC (undroppable)).
 


jgmcdee

New member
Mar 25, 2012
931
Difficult to justify changing a winning team.

But - maybe:
Hughes for Greer;
Ledesma (if fit) for Calderon (very tough on Calde after his goal scoring exploits, so maybe play Calde at RB instead of Bruno, or start with Calde at RM and bring on Ledesma later for game time);
COG for Best (unlikely; we may have to accept that Best is now the new JFC (undroppable)).

My thoughts exactly, even including the lack of decisiveness on the changes.
 






Diablo

Well-known member
Sep 22, 2014
4,389
lewes
Keep CMS out, COG on if not from start at half time....Keep Lua Lua for last 20 mins....Apart from that team as yesterday, whilst defence ropey don`t think can change and remember only few weeks ago Dunk seemed to be our only hope of scoring goals.
 




severnside gull

Well-known member
May 16, 2007
24,829
By the seaside in West Somerset
Not much to chose between them Saturday but on recent performances I think that Dunk edges it and perhaps Hughes should get a chance.

Wow! You were clearly watching a different game to me.
Dunk was culpable in all 3 goals while in each instance Greer was the other side of the box marking his man.
I know which one I think could benefit from a break.

That said I suspect we will go with the same starting lineup. Leeds are a big side and have pace. They will target our full backs so a defensively oriented midfield and a back four used to playing together makes sense rather than make changes and risk misunderstandings.
 
Last edited:




BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
Yes Dunk was at fault for the goals but his general play has been better in recent games than Greer and rather than major changes I would rest Greer and bring in Hughes. But I would be happy if it was Dunk replaced by Hughes who deserves a game to see if it improves our defence at home.
 






Everest

Me
Jul 5, 2003
20,741
Southwick
Wow! You were clearly watching a different game to me.
Dunk was culpable in all 3 goals

How was he at fault for the 3rd?
It was Ince who let Novak turn and score.
 




Blue Valkyrie

Not seen such Bravery!
Sep 1, 2012
32,165
Valhalla
Stockdale

Bruno
Hughes
Dunk
Bennett

Calderon
Kayal
Ince

Tex
O'Grady
Baldock


subs : Walton, Greer, Stephens, Holla, Ledesma, Lua Lua, Best
 


Knotty

Well-known member
Feb 5, 2004
2,421
Canterbury
Scarcasm is the words used by people not sufficiently intelligent to make their point in a normal manner, I was told.[/QUOTE

Sometimes, when intelligent comment fails to persuade someone that they are wrong, sarcasm can be a way of emphasising just how wrong they are.

Your comments about Stockdale's penalty save in particular are a case in point.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here