No way. Lose most of goal threat when he is not playing. Even when he has a quite game when he has 2/3 markers gives us more space elswhereMaybe an opportunity to rest mitoma for adringa with all the fixtures coming up?
No way. Lose most of goal threat when he is not playing. Even when he has a quite game when he has 2/3 markers gives us more space elswhereMaybe an opportunity to rest mitoma for adringa with all the fixtures coming up?
Well. Maybe but Last season we lost at home to Arsenal, Chelsea, Man Utd, and Man City.Potential banana skin i guess and i hope we get past this one …our home matches to date below…if only we were playing Chelsea or Arsenal
Three home wins
Man Utd
Tottenham
Man City
Three draws
Ipswich
Notts Forest
Wolves
I’m hopeless at guessing who starts…..but play 11 for sure
This is the team I think it will be and also the team I think it should beBert
Veltman Van Hecke Dunk Estupinan
Ayari O Reilly
Georgino Pedro Mitoma
Welbeck
Where are you getting the Minteh availability from? In today's broadcast press conference, FH didn't mention him directly (TBF he wasn't asked), but said that beyond Dunk and Lamptey all others were the same as last week -- I took that to mean that Minteh isn't available.So Dunk, Minteh, Lamptey are back in the squad and (possibly) Kadioglu. No Baleba due to the suspension.
No Hinshelwood, March (although he must be close now given training pix), Milner.
So looks like its 11 from this 21 or 22.
Verbruggen, Steele
Lamptey, Veltman, JPVH, Igor, Dunk, Estupinan + Kadioglu ?
Moder, Ayari, Wieffer, O Riley
Minteh, Mitoma, Adingra, Gruda
Georginho, Pedro, Enciso
Welbeck, Ferguson
*EDIT - missed out Gruda. Minteh was ill last week which explains his Bournemouth absence.
Yes, I think this too.my expected 11
Verbruggen
Veltman Dunk JPVH Estupinan
Ayari Wieffer
Georginho Pedro Mitoma
Welbeck
O'Riley might - we'll surely get in trouble for fielding a player like O'Reilly whom we haven't registered.O'Reilly will surely start one of Fulham or Leicester.
Looks much more effective on the left, and it is only saintsI'm not convinced by Adingra yet, when he starts. I'd be playing Mitoma.
Quite …who knows how it will all end..but one hopes for the best ..I do find the contrast in the results from those six matches quite interestingWell. Maybe but Last season we lost at home to Arsenal, Chelsea, Man Utd, and Man City.
But we did beat teams that were 16th, 17th, and 18th!
Those draws v Burnley, Sheff Utd, Fulham , Wolves were of course frustrating though.
Our WINS >>
Luton (18th)
Newcastle (7th)
Bournemouth (12th)
Brentford (16th)
Spurs (6th)
Palace (10th)
Forest (17th)
Villa (4th)
Up against a team shitter than the three we drew against, this is a banker away win.Potential banana skin i guess and i hope we get past this one …our home matches to date below…if only we were playing Chelsea or Arsenal
Three home wins
Man Utd
Tottenham
Man City
Three draws
Ipswich
Notts Forest
Wolves
I’m hopeless at guessing who starts…..but play 11 for sure
Last time we played Southampton at the Amex Just LAST YEAR !! They were rock bottom of the table , we needed to win to get into Europe no less AND ...WE DID. No sign of glue, tar or feathers or indeed, nails.Up against a team shitter than the three we drew against, this is a banker away win.
Nailed on, glued, tarred and feathered.
Once Baleba is available again, I’d expect him to start in place of Ayari then that’d be Hurzeler’s first choice starting 11.This is the team I think it will be and also the team I think it should be
Is he Mary in disguise?Pervis has played a lot & had a baby so time for a rest.
Mavis EstupiñánIs he Mary in disguise?
Rutter's still cup-tied. Why do you think everyone's picking Georginho in his place?
Verbruggen
Veltman - JPVH - Igor - Lamptey
O'Riley - Wieffer
Minteh - Rutter - Mitoma
Pedro
Pervis has played a lot & had a baby so time for a rest. We're also playing with fire with Welbz too, so time for a rest - and Minteh's talents for pressing will be very useful against Southampton. I'd possibly play Ferguson for Rutter - pro's and con's with both.