Team for QPR

[Exile]

.......................Maenpaa
Bruno.......Uwe......Dunk......Bong
Knockaert..Kayal..Stephens..Skalak
.................Baldock...Hemed






Only if you've read my match report from last night, will you understand.

 

[aolstudios]

Why put Knocky on the left?

Laziness. I'd copied & pasted from BG ;-)

 

[BensGrandad]

.......................Maenpaa
Bruno.......Uwe......Dunk......Bong
Knockaert..Kayal..Stephens..Skalak
.................Baldock...Hemed






Only if you've read my match report from last night, will you understand.

I havent but would like to where is it?

Sorry just scrolled down and found it.

 

[Machiavelli]

-------------------- Stockdale -------------------
Bruno ---- Hunemeier ---- Dunk ---- Bong
Knockaert -- Kayal --- Stephens -- March
--------------- Hemed --- Baldock ------------

Subs: Maenpaa, Tomori, Rosenior, Norwood, Skalak, Murphy, Murray

If Dunk not fit enough, Tomori to start and Forren on bench
If Baldock not fit, Murray or Murphy to start and Sidwell on bench
In other words, ten of Tuesday's starting line-up start. Murray misses out: to give him a rest; because his away form hasn't been up to much; and, despite not being up to much last night, Hemed really does deserve a(n away) start
I know this also won't be popular, but Norwood inches Sidwell out on the basis that if we're losing and perhaps even drawing, his passing range is more likely to get us that late goal.

 

[Wilko]

Stockdale

Bruno
Dunk
Uwe
Bong ( providing he is fit enough to play twice in such a short period after his injury ) if not Rosenior

Kayal
Stephens
Knoackaert
March/Murphy does not really bother me this one, I really like Murphy on the left and away from home.

Baldock if fit, otherwise Hemed
Murray

This. Spot on.

 

[perseus]

I would go wih

Stockdale
Bruno....Hunemier.....Dunk.....Bong
Rosenior....Stephens...Kayal....Knockhaert
Baldok....Murray​

Subs; Maenpaa, Tomori, Hemed, March Sidwell/Norwood, Murph /Skalak.

If Dunk not fit replace him with Tomori and put Forren on the bench
If SB not fit replace with Murphy and Skalak on the bench.

I cannot see the point of Sidwell and Norwood on the bench and should be either or.

Sorry duly amended to not have 2 LR

Apart from the typing, not far off my first choice first XI team anyway.

 

[Munchkin]

---------------------- Stockdale ---------------------
Bruno ----- Dunk ---- Hunemier ---- Pocognoli
Knockeart ----- Kayal -- Stephens ---- March
----------------- Hemed ------ Murray -------------

 

[DanRedman]

Why have you gone for Rosenior over March?

 

[junior]

I actually couldn't give a toss who plays. They're all brilliant and we're going up!

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

Sidwell for Kayal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[aolstudios]

Sidwell for Kayal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yep

 

[Nathan]

Dunk fit but still no Baldock.

[tweet]849940365918568448[/tweet]

 

[bristolseagull]

We have two "Rosenior's" now? Blimey. At least that coveres left back.

His Dad.

 

[Whitechapel]

My only chance change would be March on the bench and Murphy starting.

Think March offers much more off the bench currently and Murphy obviously offers much more than Skalak unless Skalak is on form.

 

[Don Tmatter]

With today's news of no Baldock tomorrow,

-----------------------Stockdale---------------------
Bruno----Hunemeier--------Dunk---Pocognoli
----------------------------------------------------------
--------------------Kayal-------Stephens-----------
Knockaert--------------Towell--------------March
---------------------------Hemed----------------------

Subs
Maenpaa
Rosenior
Forren
Norwood
Sidwell
Murphy
Murray