happypig
Staring at the rude boys
Can Tarkowski be punished retrospectively for his elbow into Murray's ribs off the ball ? 100% intentional.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Tarkowski (Dirty B'stad)
- Thread starter happypig
- Start date
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
As long as he only gets a TWO match ban.
Don't want him banned when Burnley play Huddersfield, do we ?
Don't want him banned when Burnley play Huddersfield, do we ?
Trelford Mills Guide Dog
Active member
- Jun 14, 2008
- 575
Typical Dyche team full of dirty ******** !
1066familyman
Radio User
- Jan 15, 2008
- 15,235
Does compose a lovely tune though to be fair.
BrianWade4
Well-known member
Elbow in the throat.
Dirty.
#brexit
Dirty.
#brexit
studio150
Well-known member
Top 6 side, so no intent, just a coming together, no action
That aside, thought he was very poor.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
luppers
New member
Murray has his throat in a funny place !
BensGrandad
New member
MOTD showed it so I would expect the League to at least look at it but there is no telling with the idiots on the panel.
m20gull
Well-known member
No, no no, In fact Murray to be given ban by the FA for reacting - that would be only consistent and fair.
BensGrandad
New member
I dont know where you get that from unless it is intended as a p..s take.
sjamesb3466
Well-known member
Is this a piss take or are you actually that simple?
darkwolf666
Well-known member
Dorset Seagull
Once Dolphin, Now Seagull
I’m not a fan of retrospective action. Any action against a player should only be to the advantage of the side they are currently playing when the incident occurred. If other opposition benefit from the subsequent ban then that is just not fair and as mentioned by Blue Valkyrie can further penalise the team on the other end of the original incident.
In some ways the same applies to goal line technology and VAR. There are several incidents that are missed by a referee during a game and any one of them could have an effect on something later on. I say keep it simple and let the referees decision be final and accept that it probably evens out over a season. Also go back to the simple offside rule about when the ball is played forward and being in an offside position. I think there are probably more incorrect offside decisions now than there ever were.
In some ways the same applies to goal line technology and VAR. There are several incidents that are missed by a referee during a game and any one of them could have an effect on something later on. I say keep it simple and let the referees decision be final and accept that it probably evens out over a season. Also go back to the simple offside rule about when the ball is played forward and being in an offside position. I think there are probably more incorrect offside decisions now than there ever were.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,778
It would only be right, the way he jabbed his ribs into Tarkowski's elbow
BensGrandad - mate - do you not think that the theatrical: "No no no" at the start was a bit a give-away?
Bob'n'weave
Well-known member
Disagree. Especially when it affects the outcome of a game. The dig in the ribs was intentional and took Murray out - our striker in their penalty area.
The results stay the same either way so you are getting your 'all evens out/part of the game' bit, but retrospective punishments will help to curb the shitty cheating/diving/fouling off the ball etc.
banjo
GOSBTS
Shooting Star
Well-known member
If Hemed was banned retrospectively for the alleged "stamp" on Yedlin, Tarkowski should be retrospectively banned for the elbow on Murray.