aberllefenni
Active member
- Jan 15, 2009
- 467
Would a season-long loan be out of the question?
Bissouma goes for 40million, Abraham signs for 40 million.
Too simple... incoming player wages would be double the outgoing player. IMHO
Just need to stump over 130k a week to go with it. And deal with him earning double our nearest highest earner
Just need to stump over 130k a week to go with it. And deal with him earning double our nearest highest earner
Plus that million quid for his relatives, like he wanted for coming on loan?
I still rather go for Giroud (out if contract, so available on a free - and yes, I know 'free' in this context is something of a misnomer!)
Only a 15th hand impression thru the media, but TA does seem a bit mercenary.
Giroud would be great but you'd expect him to go to China, the USA or Palarse for massive wages to see our his career.
Re: Giroud - what you say could be right. On the other hand, there are two variants of top class footballer. For some it is all about money (possibly, 15th. hand impressions and all that, the TA model?) - it's the one thing that's most important. If they're on £100K a week, they're affronted that they're not getting £130K a week.Only a 15th hand impression thru the media, but TA does seem a bit mercenary.
Giroud would be great but you'd expect him to go to China, the USA or Palarse for massive wages to see our his career.
Yeah he ain’t coming.
This deal is going to have a lot of bidders, even if we were to spend the transfer fee, breaking our wage budget is not our style of deal.
I would love to be proved wrong however and see the club find a way. If would surely be one of our most significant Premier League signings.
I wonder if a Bissouma - Abraham swap deal is at all possible?