34-3
Chopra, Wells and van Zyl all back in the hutch.
trailing by 333 with 7 wickets in hand.
Chopra, Wells and van Zyl all back in the hutch.
trailing by 333 with 7 wickets in hand.
These imbeciles are dragging the good name of our county down with them.
Show some fight lads
I can bare to watch/listen
Yes... that mid-70s top order will hopefully never be surpassed for consistent ropiness. I am lucky in that, while I was present at the ground, I am just too young to remember their exploits with any clarity.Oh, I don't know. I remember the early to mid 70s when we had a top order containing Jerry Morley (av 23), Mark Faber (av 22), Jerry Groome (av 15), Simon Hoadley (av 17), Mike Buss (av 24) and Austin Parsons (av 26). Peter Graves with an average of 27 was probably the best of them. We finished in the bottom three for about six or seven years.
Salt and Rawlins showing some fight.
These are decent young cricketers. Maybe today will be a good day for them.
Salt and Rawlins showing some fight.
These are decent young cricketers. Maybe today will be a good day for them.
It seems that Gillespie might be more suited to keeping a team of talents on an even keel than rolling his sleeves up and doing a year round coaching job if that is what is needed at Hove...?This season is alarming proof that getting in (ostensibly) competent people in behind the scenes doesn't always translate into onfield success. At least not immediately.
That is a mental image I didn't need.
Oh, I don't know. I remember the early to mid 70s when we had a top order containing Jerry Morley (av 23), Mark Faber (av 22), Jerry Groome (av 15), Simon Hoadley (av 17), Mike Buss (av 24) and Austin Parsons (av 26). Peter Graves with an average of 27 was probably the best of them. We finished in the bottom three for about six or seven years.
Looking at those averages you'd certainly like to think so but actually they just weren't very good batsmen (by first-class standards) ...Except that those guys had it harder batting on UNCOVERED pitches.