Sussex Express Falmer Vote!!!!

[Nemesis]

I think all of the bastards who have been rigging the vote have gone to bed...the figure in favour of Falmer is going up. Slowly, but going up.

If you're bored and want to up the numbers.......don't use Firefox to open up the vote page and right click to use the view page in IE tab. That would be cheating.

 

[FamilyGuy]

It's only 70% v 30% now - get on and Vote

 

[Caveman]

It's only 70% v 30% now - get on and Vote

Is Falmer the best place for the albion's football stadium?
71% Yes
29% No

Going back up.

 

[SULLY COULDNT SHOOT]

Voted... still the same

 

[Titanic]

Seems fairly solid at 71/29... a pretty decent result!

 

[Scoffers]

Voted, same % as above

 

[Giraffe]

72% for. Don't forget you can vote every day. Crap poll.

 

[Caveman]

72% for. Don't forget you can vote every day. Crap poll.

Wrong. You can vote as many times as you like.

Close all of your browsers after voting. Then reopen them and vote again.

 

[SULLY COULDNT SHOOT]

De Vecchi must have voted a 100 times then!!!! Cow!

 

[newhaven seagull 85]

73% for falmer 27% against

 

[cjd]

Has the voting finished now....?.........and are they going to print the result...?

 

[Screaming J]

Has the voting finished now....?.........and are they going to print the result...?

Think it must have. No longre on the link given at page 1 of this thread.

 

[unnameable]

The poll was hardly scientific. But the result was conclusive. Lewes Today would not have offered the poll if they did not intend to publicise the result. They don't seem to have given the result any publicity yet, however.

 

[Icy Gull]

Expect the published result to be very different to how it was when we last saw it with 75% in favour

 

[Cheshire Cat]

Thank you for your email about voting on our site.

You were not the only person who attempted to vote on more than one occasion. Systems we have in place detected instances of multiple voting.

This does not happen often as most people regard an on-line poll as an opportunity to express a view and are not prepared to try and vote more than once in a bid to 'swing' the result.

As I say, our systems do detect such attempts and when this happens we withdraw the poll and do not publish the result.

Yours sincerely,

Paul Watson, Editor
Johnston Press plc Registered in Scotland no. SC015382 Registered Office: 53 Manor Place, Edinburgh, EH3 7EG

 

[sten_super]

What a croc of shit. If they were really bothered about multiple voting then they could block more than one vote per IP address. Bastards.

 

[Brovion]

What a croc of shit. If they were really bothered about multiple voting then they could block more than one vote per IP address. Bastards.

Indeed. They wanted to show an anti-Falmer vote and it backfired on them.

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Charlatans.

 

[Cheshire Cat]

I can't remember what I wrote in the e-mail as I was slightly pissed at the time, but I did say something about what a total waste of time and space the poll was if it could be fixed this easily, especially given the issue of TV programmes rigging telephone polls.

Even NSC polls stop me voting more than once so they are clearly an accurate and scientific measure of popular public opinion