The posts on this thread confirm that, as well as the dick-heads, there are a surprising number of thoughtful and intelligent people on here.
What they also confirm is that the problem has little to do with politics. The lefties however continue to believe that if there was a labour government in power then "Wooosh", no more foodbanks, no more homeless, everything free for the feckless. Fairyland.
It's a very slippery slope when we make comments about poor people having too many children. Firstly. I'm not sure that many poor people actually do have 5 children anymore. The average is still under 2 per family across the country and there's no indication that it's disproportionately higher in less well-off households. Secondly, unless you are super-rich I reckon that purely finance-wise it's never wise to have children. I agree that if you're really struggling financially then that does need to be taken into consideration in a big way, the thought of some sort of eugenics is beyond the pale. Speaking personally, I'm from a family of 5 children, we were dirt poor growing up and no doubt my family got more from the system than we put in during that time but all of us are now adults, we're all taxpayers and repaid that and then some.
Single mothers are the scapegoats but they really aren't the problem and I'm absolutely positive that most of them don't deliberately set out to be in those circumstances. I used to work for a housing charity and during that time did some voluntary work helping tenants with budgeting, understanding their bills and suchlike. The claims that they've all got the latest phones, high-end flat-screen TVs and designer clothes wasn't something I saw very often.
The issue, as both Larus and I have argued, is big business not paying their full whack and the government not having the balls to tackle the problem. There's around 3,500 people employed specifically to prevent benefit fraud whilst only 700 to prevent tax fraud. Benefit fraud is estimated at £1.3bn whilst the 'tax gap' (what should have come in versus what actually did) is estimated at £36bn a year. The focus is clearly arse about face but all the while we get the red top scare stories about benefit fraudsters, public anger is diverted.
Another issue is the disparity between the penalties and interest charged to big businesses and those given to small businesses. Vodafone, Starbucks and Google have gotten away with next to nothing in the way of punitive charges and even have enough clout to negotiate how much of their unpaid tax they are prepared to pay. It's a totally different story if you're a hairdresser, taxi driver or another of the businesses that HMRC regularly investigate (small businesses that have significant unreceipted cash income). I'm all for more transparency to show that we are all treated equally in the eyes of the law and would make it law that all HMRC decisions on tax evasion, the penalties imposed and the rate of interest charged are published. We need to start getting angry with companies that generate significant profits from the UK but who pay negligible UK tax.
The posts on this thread confirm that, as well as the dick-heads, there are a surprising number of thoughtful and intelligent people on here.
What they also confirm is that the problem has little to do with politics. The lefties however continue to believe that if there was a labour government in power then "Wooosh", no more foodbanks, no more homeless, everything free for the feckless. Fairyland.
The trick is to get somewhere in the middle......the problem with our society is that we have lost our manufacturing base, our traditional industrial heartland and rely on services. Be it financial or retail..all which need sone form of foreign investment. We have very few British companies now.
Manufacturing contributes £6.7tn to the global economy. Contrary to widespread perceptions, UK manufacturing is strong with the UK currently the world's ninth largest industrial nation. Manufacturing makes up 10% of GVA and 45% of UK exports, and directly employs 2.7 million people.
We have very few British companies now.
I don't necessarily think that is correct. The " left wing" have a more joined up society view, but as all socialist parties have found, you heed a capitalist spine to provide the finance in taxes and wealth creation to make socialist policies to work.
It was the old argument about communism...we all know that communism should be an ideal, where everyone equal in a society, but again, that doesn't take into account human nature and the need for humans to better themselves, or be better than someone else. It also doesn't take into account that some people are lazy ad work shy and some peopke are high flyers and want to over achieve.
The trick is to get somewhere in the middle......the problem with our society is that we have lost our manufacturing base, our traditional industrial heartland and rely on services. Be it financial or retail..all which need sone form of foreign investment. We have very few British companies now.
...the problem with our society is that we have lost our manufacturing base, our traditional industrial heartland and rely on services. Be it financial or retail..all which need sone form of foreign investment. We have very few British companies now.
This. Through hard work I had a reasonable life, bought a house and brought up my family. I did a 40 hour week but if times were hard and I copped for a big bill or needed a new second hand car,overtime was available. At times I was doing a 60 hour week and at one point a few 70 hour weeks. It was hard and grinding but It was time and a half or sometimes a little double time and we got through it
Good God, you sound like an advert for Hovis!