... and re-arrested following new allegations of sexual offences.
... and re-arrested following new allegations of sexual offences.
... and re-arrested following new allegations of sexual offences.
Am I the only person that dosent see the point in all this.
Saville,Stuart hall,DLT,Rolf Harris & im sure there are many more offences that were committed many years ago by so called celebs.
Why were these so called offences not reported 20,30 or 40 years ago when the incidents happened.
Why is it that when we live in a day & age when you can't say boo to a goose do all these accusations come out.
When I was a little boy standing in the north stand it was seen as acceptable to make monkey chants to black players,
I would be lying if I said I never joined in,but that was then & this is now.Does that mean that if a retired footballer decides that we was racially abused at the goldstone 30 years ago that the police will investigate & see if we have a case to answer.
What I'm trying to say is what was acceptable 30 years ago may not be now.
Spending millions of pounds of public money to send men that are in there 70's & 80's to prison for crimes that were committed 30 years ago & were not investigated at the time seems pointless to me.
Am I the only person that dosent see the point in all this.
Saville,Stuart hall,DLT,Rolf Harris & im sure there are many more offences that were committed many years ago by so called celebs.
Why were these so called offences not reported 20,30 or 40 years ago when the incidents happened.
Why is it that when we live in a day & age when you can't say boo to a goose do all these accusations come out.
When I was a little boy standing in the north stand it was seen as acceptable to make monkey chants to black players,
I would be lying if I said I never joined in,but that was then & this is now.Does that mean that if a retired footballer decides that we was racially abused at the goldstone 30 years ago that the police will investigate & see if we have a case to answer.
What I'm trying to say is what was acceptable 30 years ago may not be now.
Spending millions of pounds of public money to send men that are in there 70's & 80's to prison for crimes that were committed 30 years ago & were not investigated at the time seems pointless to me.
If your son/daughter had been interfered with, I think you might have a different opinion.
Justice needs to served, no matter how long it takes.
If it was my son/daughter I would have chopped his hand/cock off but I would have done it when it happened not 30 years later.
If the offences were committed by non celebs then (a) would not be reported & (b) would not be investigated 30 years later.
If it was my son/daughter I would have chopped his hand/cock off but I would have done it when it happened not 30 years later.
If the offences were committed by non celebs then (a) would not be reported & (b) would not be investigated 30 years later.
If it was my son/daughter I would have chopped his hand/cock off but I would have done it when it happened not 30 years later.
But only if your son / daughter had actually told you then.
I guess you hold the same opinion about hunting down Nazi's from WWII ?