Apparently, giving a storm a name means it's respected more by the general public, so we decide against doing stupid shit like fixing a TV aerial during inclement weather.Nope - it's certainly no 1987 and the weather in Worthing yesterday was far worse than it is today.
Just more media frenzy.
BTW does anybody know why first the BBC and now other media outlets started giving storms names? I can understand why CBeebies might do it for the young 'uns but R4 ffs? A storm is a weather event not a person or pet.
Giving a storm a name tells me NOTHING about the storm. How bad is it? Is it a windy storm? Or a rain storm? When will it hit? How long will it last? How blowy will it be? Is it going to be bad enough to cause damage?
None of those questions are answered by some dimlow with nothing better to do trying to give a storm a persona by giving it a name.
....and just like that, BOSH, he's live...
Yep - weird amount of people on here who seem to be disappointed there isn't this amount of damage. And it's clearly not the media hyping things up either as the devastation elsewhere shows - we have just been lucky(or not, in some folks eyes it seems) to have missed the worst of itStuff like this is why I don’t get why people think of things as a let down. Do people want this to happen to them so they have a story? Maybe I am just old and boring now but I will be perfectly happy if my fence doesn’t blow down and car get crushed by a tree.
....so we decide against doing stupid shit like fixing a TV aerial during inclement weather.
That said, he avoided the inevitable 6am police raid...
If only he'd stayed indoors.
I was disappointed to discover he didn't actually live in a pink windmill, just a modest cottage near Rye.That said, he avoided the inevitable 6am police raid...
Storms are named by the Met Office and other linked institutions (Irish, French counterparts etc.). Not by the media.BTW does anybody know why first the BBC and now other media outlets started giving storms names? I can understand why CBeebies might do it for the young 'uns but R4 ffs? A storm is a weather event not a person or pet.
It was first done over 100 years ago by Clement Wragge, as any fule kno.BTW does anybody know why first the BBC and now other media outlets started giving storms names? I can understand why CBeebies might do it for the young 'uns but R4 ffs? A storm is a weather event not a person or pet.
Giving a storm a name tells me NOTHING about the storm. How bad is it? Is it a windy storm? Or a rain storm? When will it hit? How long will it last? How blowy will it be? Is it going to be bad enough to cause damage?
None of those questions are answered by some dimlow with nothing better to do trying to give a storm a persona by giving it a name.
He used to drink in The Queen’s Head in Icklesham, always appeared a nice chap.That said, he avoided the inevitable 6am police raid...
It wasn't the BBC or any other media outlet that started giving them names, it was the Met Office and BBC simply reported using the given names. The weather presenters used to be Met office employees. Met as in meteorological, not metropolitan....
Just more media frenzy.
BTW does anybody know why first the BBC and now other media outlets started giving storms names? I can understand why CBeebies might do it for the young 'uns but R4 ffs? A storm is a weather event not a person or pet.
Giving a storm a name tells me NOTHING about the storm. How bad is it? Is it a windy storm? Or a rain storm? When will it hit? How long will it last? How blowy will it be? Is it going to be bad enough to cause damage?
None of those questions are answered by some dimlow with nothing better to do trying to give a storm a persona by giving it a name.
Try telling that to people in the Channel Islands - easily the worst since 1987 for them. We were just lucky here in Sussex and along much of the south coast that it tracked just a bit further south than expected - but it was very marginal.Nope - it's certainly no 1987 and the weather in Worthing yesterday was far worse than it is today.
Just more media frenzy.
BTW does anybody know why first the BBC and now other media outlets started giving storms names? I can understand why CBeebies might do it for the young 'uns but R4 ffs? A storm is a weather event not a person or pet.
Giving a storm a name tells me NOTHING about the storm. How bad is it? Is it a windy storm? Or a rain storm? When will it hit? How long will it last? How blowy will it be? Is it going to be bad enough to cause damage?
None of those questions are answered by some dimlow with nothing better to do trying to give a storm a persona by giving it a name.
Bizarre November weatherthe wind seems to be picking up again down at east preston…. the seas very choppy
Each and every time I'm doing something bloody stupid I think of Rod and his aerial fixing, Doesn't stop me doing it, but does make me think of the consequences.
If only he'd stayed indoors.
It also allows the number per year or season to be quantified as they have to meet a criteria and are then named in sequence with names beginning 'A', 'B', 'C' and so on, so if the last one in a given time period is called 'Eric' you know you've had five that met the severity. A nice side effect is it gives insurers and reinsurers some structured data to work with when assessing the impact of their storm claims (these people are currently doing a LOT of work regarding climate change and natural catastrophes).It wasn't the BBC or any other media outlet that started giving them names, it was the Met Office and BBC simply reported using the given names. The weather presenters used to be Met office employees. Met as in meteorological, not metropolitan.
'The Met Office decided to start giving storms names back in 2014, in the same way they do in America. The first windstorm to be named was Abigail on 10 November 2015. The Met Office hoped that naming big storms will make people more aware of them and how dangerous they can be'.