I have and some of it appears a bit daft, but I'm agreeing with his opening post.I think if you read Bushy's posts a bit more thoroughly, you'll find there is a bit more to his opinion than a simple concern for the British justice system...
Still havent received anything aproaching an answer to this question , why arent they spending time and money searching for theones in bangladesh, and why was one only charged with violent disorder , why not murder as in common purpose like the case that we are talking about on this thread ?Just a pity this case never received he same attention, I wonder why ?
Civil Liberty - Remembering Richard Everitt
I'm not too sure they are bent, more of a '"he's a fuzzy wuzzy so we can't be arsed looking too hard" attitude.
you're probably right, but for the reason being that the pendulum has swung so far past any reasonably fair interpretation of fair race relations that tossers like Jesse Jackson are given airtime to claim that " blacks are still second class citizens" without being laughed at .I have and some of it appears a bit daft, but I'm agreeing with his opening post.
I also suspect he wouldn't have bothered commenting at all if it justice being corrected in favour of a white kid against a black gang. Or if someone had raised concerns about what it means (such as The Merry Prankster and co), he'd have said "I bet you wouldn't have thought that if the teenager was black"
Thanks Buzzer - very very interesting stuff. That coupled with the jury nobbling allegations made in other instances do kind of show how brave the jury were in this instance to convict. Just imagine the fear they must have been under?
This.I don't buy that at all. No-one would have dared nobble this jury. Imagine the fear of NOT convicting, more like.
I don't buy that at all. No-one would have dared nobble this jury. Imagine the fear of NOT convicting, more like.
They might have been free men now, if they had been convicted all those years ago, behaved themselves and shown remorse.
Good, good.