Stephen Lawrence MURDERERS

[aolstudios]

Which makes me wonder, when have Bushy and Das Reich ever taken to support the perspective of a black person in a 'white on black' or 'black on white' racism case?

Which is why 90% of this thread is pointless - their posts are about nothing but race, whatever else they hope to hide it behind. Makes me sick when I see it pandered to and excuses made by otherwise reasonable people

 

[aolstudios]

Why would they support a black view of a black on white case? Who would?

This threads getting retarded beyond belief now.

because they will always somehow support the white view of a white on black case

 

[looney]

because they will always somehow support the white view of a white on black case

Firstly thats not what I said, secondly I haven't seen them posting the "white view". Seen Bushy critisise the trial/evidence, so have I, seen Das trolling.

It appears your mindset is racist. Theres a legal view, a view to justice even views on racially aggregated crime. In fact Bushy denies your allegations, even when I made them but you keep going on and on even when a mod told you to put a sock in it

Give it a rest.

 

[Chicken Runner61]

Why would they support a black view of a black on white case? Who would?

This threads getting retarded beyond belief now.

Doesn't that say more about you than anyone else?

At which point can overcome your bigotry Looney? Obviously not colour or race? Religion? Sex? Sexual Orientation? Class or Disability?

 

[RowleyBirkinQ.C(deceased)]

Why would they support a black view of a black on white case? Who would?

This threads getting retarded beyond belief now.

I've been viewing this thread and steered clear. But looneys right. It's turning away from the original conversation and turning into a bit of an ego fest for some.


Sent by Derek Achora via the spirit world.

 

[looney]

Doesn't that say more about you than anyone else?

At which point can overcome your bigotry Looney? Obviously not colour or race? Religion? Sex? Sexual Orientation? Class or Disability?

So let me get this straight. A black man attacks, say stabs, a white man and I am supposed to sympathise with the assailant of the crime and if I dont I am some kind of racist biggot?

You f***ing of your rocker.

 

[The Merry Prankster]

Which is why 90% of this thread is pointless - their posts are about nothing but race, whatever else they hope to hide it behind. Makes me sick when I see it pandered to and excuses made by otherwise reasonable people

Let me get this right - reasonable people (of which I count myself ) are not allowed to agree with any points made by bushy about anything at all because of some of his views and it will make you sick if they do.

Grow the f*** up.

 

[Chicken Runner61]

So let me get this straight. A black man attacks, say stabs, a white man and I am supposed to sympathise with the assailant of the crime and if I dont I am some kind of racist biggot?

You f***ing of your rocker.

Looney you have already made your mind up that he's guilty your SUPPOSED to be impartial at this stage.

 

[Beach Hut]

Don't lose sight of the fact there have been some serial racialists on NSC who caused some potential issues in cyber policing land

 

[Chicken Runner61]

I've been viewing this thread and steered clear. But looneys right. It's turning away from the original conversation and turning into a bit of an ego fest for some.


Sent by Derek Achora via the spirit world.

No he isn't he's missed the whole point and that as a Juror you are supposed to be impartial before the evidence is presented- the fact that its a black on white ACCUSATION has nothing to do with it

 

[looney]

Looney you have already made your mind up that he's guilty your SUPPOSED to be impartial at this stage.

Stop twisting my words. Two examples of crimes were given, black on white and white on black. I would not sympathise with the assailant just because they where black any more than I would sympathise with a white assailant. The issue of guilt was not relevent to the question, the question was Bushy and Das biases.

 

[looney]

No he isn't he's missed the whole point and that as a Juror you are supposed to be impartial before the evidence is presented- the fact that its a black on white ACCUSATION has nothing to do with it

No, the trial has nothing to do with this bit of argument. Try reading the thread properly.

 

[Chicken Runner61]

Stop twisting my words. Two examples of crimes were given, black on white and white on black. I would not sympathise with the assailant just because they where black any more than I would sympathise with a white assailant. The issue of guilt was not relevent to the question, the question was Bushy and Das biases.

I'm not twisting your words..

Some people on here have implied that the accused in the Stephen Lawrence case never got a fair hearing because the jurors had knowledge of the case and the media and public have made them aware of aspects of the case including their racism.

The question was would a black person get a fair trial in front of Jurors who were racialist irrespective of the evidence, facts or media details of the case? I suspect they wouldn't, what about you?

 

[Chicken Runner61]

No, the trial has nothing to do with this bit of argument. Try reading the thread properly.

No its the whole point - How can you argue that the SL accused never got a fair trial if you wouldn't give someone a fair trial in any circumstances be it for murder or anything?

 

[aolstudios]

Let me get this right - reasonable people (of which I count myself ) are not allowed to agree with any points made by bushy about anything at all because of some of his views and it will make you sick if they do.

Grow the f*** up.

I'm happy to let you get it right but you just got it wrong. I said nothing of the sort, so don't put words in my mouth. I'm sure I agree with him about some subjects too. I felt that at times people were giving credence to points that were posted simply because of a racist agenda, while not taking that agenda into account. I'm not exactly the first to notice any of this am I?

 

[looney]

No its the whole point - How can you argue that the SL accused never got a fair trial if you wouldn't give someone a fair trial in any circumstances be it for murder or anything?

Er.. where have I said i wouldn't give someone a fair trial?

 

[looney]

I'm not twisting your words..

Some people on here have implied that the accused in the Stephen Lawrence case never got a fair hearing because the jurors had knowledge of the case and the media and public have made them aware of aspects of the case including their racism.

The question was would a black person get a fair trial in front of Jurors who were racialist irrespective of the evidence, facts or media details of the case? I suspect they wouldn't, what about you?

You maybe right but that wasn't the point I was addressing which you latched onto by mistake, have you been down the pub?

 

[Chicken Runner61]

Er.. where have I said i wouldn't give someone a fair trial?

It didn't refer directly to you - why don't you answer the question?

 

[Chicken Runner61]

You maybe right but that wasn't the point I was addressing which you latched onto by mistake, have you been down the pub?

It was my post YOU answered how can I have got it wrong? Are you on drugs? if not do you want some?

 

[looney]

It didn't refer directly to you - why don't you answer the question?

I did, sort of in my last post. It wasn't what I was originally refering to. I suspect you have had to much to drink so at this point I'll wish you a good night.