BrightonCottager
Well-known member
Thanks, @Harry Wilson's tackle , I was hoping you'd post on this thread (see you back on the Wordle one tomorrow). Those are very interesting articles. I've not got any of the contributory symptoms (Dr told me I was at 9.9% additional risk, taking lifestyle and BMI etc into account) but have had a stubbornly high total cholesterol (5.8 / 5.9) and strong family history of stroke/ heart problems. So I took the plunge. I can cope with extra farting, and I can now at least blame the meds!I have been on them since around 2005. Simva gave me muscle ache (thighs). Atorva doesn't. The 'stool' is a bit glisteny, but there are no other gastric issues.
Statins are good for the symptomless middle aged to reduce the rate of atheroma development.
I think they are brilliant meds, and combined with diet will make some of us last maybe 10-15 years longer. I would recommend anyone over 50 taking them regardless of health issues. All my cardiology pals are on them as a 'no brainer' exercise. Official data is also pretty clear. For example :
Statin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement - PubMed
The USPSTF recommends that clinicians prescribe a statin for the primary prevention of CVD for adults aged 40 to 75 years who have 1 or more CVD risk factors (ie, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, or smoking) and an estimated 10-year CVD risk of 10% or greater. (B recommendation) The USPSTF...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govReal-world data show the effect of statins in primary prevention
This editorial refers to ‘The effect of statins on mortality and cardiovascular disease in primary care hypertensive patients without other cardiovascularacademic.oup.com
The latter reports a 20% risk reduction. By contrast I have recently writtin a press release for my institution about a the risk of adverse effects of medicinal cannabis, where the risk goes to 1%. I dismissed it as bollocks (or 'noise' as I put it).
Happy to explain any technical terms in the above, with the usual proviso that I am a scientist not a clinician.