Jim Van Winkle
Well-known member
Always liked this review of the Phantom Menace.
Thanks for that. Anything else you haven't seen that you feel you need to get off your chest?
Well it's a thread about Star Wars and I was just saying that I have never seen them.
The first 3 were all truly awful in thier own ways. The Phantom Menace is dire and easily the worst of the 6. ...
As long as George Lucas is nowhere near the script, we'll be fine
Revenge is the worst because its just a huge long unbelieve plot hole to engineer the end. i could understand the massacre of the Tuskens in attack, but the boy from tattooine and father-to-be killing the jedi kiddies... doesn't scan. could he not talk to Obi Wan or any other jedi? end of the day film makes the Jedi look a bit shit that they can tell whats going on right under their nose with either Anakin or Palpatine, so ultimatly harms the whole concept for me.
The first 3 were all truly awful in thier own ways. The Phantom Menace is dire and easily the worst of the 6. Jar Jar Binks, a little kid flying a space ship and the whole set up itself 'There are some trade disagreements in the Galaxy regarding high import taxes to Naboo. Chancellor Palpatine is trying to negotiate a discount for bulk import.....' Yawn. Liam Neeson spends the whole time with a 'Why did I sign up for this shit? look on his face and even Ray Parks Darth Maul has no dialogue because he sounds like Danny Dyer - At least that would have added some fun 'Come here Obi Wan and I'll smash your face in you cu...'
Attack of the clones is better but is blighted by the 'love' scenes which are so badly written and acted its untrue. We know Portman and Christenson can act from other films but the acting here is like a school play. Granted, the set pieces at the end are good but its a long time coming and at least they got the sith right with Christopher Lee.
Revenge of the sith starts well (off with his head!) but again goes downhill. The transition to the darkside is totally unbelievable (Oi, Darth, go and kill the kids will you then switch the droids off will ya? ''Ok mate'') and the dialogue is pitiful especially from Anakin 'I hate you' 'In my opinion, the jedi are evil' and that's before we move onto the laughably bad twin birth death scene. The whole playing out of the goalless draw at the end is nothing to get excited about either - we all know whats going to happen. Overall, Give me Ewoks any day of the week.
One thing I will agree on is that I am looking forward to the new ones. They won't have the weight of expectation (everyone thinks they will be shit), JJ has got good form with Star Trek as well as the Toy Story writer and the original charactors are back - something that 1-3 suffered really badly from.
Someone put far too much thought into this and came up with a viewing order that I like the sound of: 4, 5, 2, 3, 6.
This keeps the revelation at the end of 5 unspoiled, leaving it on the cliffhanger of Han in carbonite, then uses 2 and 3 as a kind of extended flashback to fill in Anakin's back story, before tying everything together in 6. It just about pulls the two independent trilogies into a single story. And it leaves out episode 1 altogether, which is a bonus.
That's the short version of the justification; in the link above the inventor points out several more ways in which his "machete order" improves on either 1-6 or 4-6,1-3 ordering. He's pretty convincing.
This is why I never take any notice of other people's film reviews.
Sometimes you just have to ignore the plot holes, questionable acting and allow them tell you the story. It's a bit like going to see a hypnotist but not allowing him to do it to you and then saying he's crap afterwards.
They made Episode 1 almost as a kids film which is why it's hard to like it if you're over the age of 12. It's the same with the Harry Potter films, 1-3 are a bit pants but the later one's stack up against any action based sci-fi
They made Episode 1 almost as a kids film which is why it's hard to like it if you're over the age of 12. It's the same with the Harry Potter films, 1-3 are a bit pants but the later one's stack up against any action based sci-fi
I take your point - Everything has plot holes in it if you look hard enough but this is great gaping chasm. Anakin goes from Kevin the Teenager to Child killing mass murderer in about 3 hours.
A good film will hynotise you, these were like bad comedies at times meaning it was impossible to enable my mind to switch off. These three rival the Holiday special which everyone connected with Star wars tries to forget about.
... I found it all believable because teenage Anakin is a bit thick!
Although I guess it just shows how subjective all this stuff is. I was just thinking I didn't like the ending to Django Unchained because what the Christoph Waltz character does didn't make sense, it kind of ruined the film for me. I never got that with revenge of the sith, I found it all believable because teenage Anakin is a bit thick!
I take your point - Everything has plot holes in it if you look hard enough but this is great gaping chasm. Anakin goes from Kevin the Teenager to Child killing mass murderer in about 3 hours.
Not sure on that really, the Jedi council sense the fear in him straight away. Through Ep2. his views of politics, of totalitarianism, and his revenge in the slaughter of all the Sand People in the camp holding his mother were all building toward a troubled mind. Yes, eventually it did appear he went from still being good to murdering kids, but the Dark Side took hold when he finally stopped resisting it, afterall it is a supernatural force.
To be fair, Obi Wan in Episode 4 in saying that Vader killed Anakin likened it to a sudden act rather than a gradual transformation, hence throughout all the series you 'turn' to the dark side, and in ROTJ, the emperor urges Luke to give into his hate, like it would be a trigger for the dark side to take over, there was an expectancy that Luke could be turned there and then. I think it was quite consistent that turning to the dark side could be an instant transformation.