Less than Alec Guinness got for The Empire Strikes Back and ROTJ.
Didn't he make a fortune from the first one though?
As for the film, saw it tonight and thoroughly enjoyed it.
Less than Alec Guinness got for The Empire Strikes Back and ROTJ.
Don't know about the first, but he did the filiming for the second and third in a day (or half) and got something like 0.4% of the entire takings for the films.Didn't he make a fortune from the first one though?
Don't know about the first, but he did the filiming for the second and third in a day (or half) and got something like 0.4% of the entire takings for the films.
No I haven't, I must say. Any recommendations?
I was five when the first film came out in 1977 and remember going to see it at the cinema and being hooked. I tolerated the prequels bit little more and had set my bar accordingly low for The Force Awakens. However, I loved it. Really, really enjoyed it. It made me feel as though as I was 11 or 12 again, as I got swept away in it (and I don't tend to watch anything action/Marvel related these days). It's pretty faithful to its roots and feels a lot more tangible than the prequels as quite a bit less of it is spat out of a computer. It will work as a stand-alone film for the new generation but I reckon there's enough there to please most long standing watchers.
Whose acting was disappointing?character development (and some of the acting) was very disappointing.
Whose acting was disappointing?
Snoke seemed a bit hollow. Can't think of a well delivered line from Mark Hamill. Anthony Daniels was a bit robotic...
This is absolutely worth watching if you're a Star Wars fan.
A documentary on George Lucas and the making (and reception) of the original trilogy.
...The disabling of the shield was a joke and seemed to be totally separate from the attack which appeared to take about 3 minutes.
Added to that the continuity throughout the film was terrible (and yes i know that it is a childrens fantasy film) but on a number of occasions characters were in one place, yet a number of seconds later...
before commiting to 2.5hrs, is this a real history acknowledging maybe even explaining the original plots and story, or revisionist history that maintains the pretense that George always wanted to do a trilogy for the first films and wanted to do the backstory of Vader first but couldnt sell that story? (a ludicrous claim given how contrived the second trilogy was getting to Vader's creation)
Anyone think the young girl is Luke skywalker's daughter?