BBassic
I changed this.
- Jul 28, 2011
- 13,055
It's a weird one for me personally.
I'm lucky to have a job that enables me to work from home. It's looking like, when this is all over, we'll continue working from home because we've proven to be as effective, if not more in some cases, in delivering our work. But some of the arguments put forth in that report certainly don't apply to me, nor many others.
I walked to my office so wasn't paying anything toward commuting.
I took in my own lunch so wasn't supporting local shops / restaurants with my custom at lunch time.
Since working from home I've had to buy myself a decent chair and a couple of bits of tech which my company refused to pay for because the pandemic is a "temporary situation".
Now we're in the cold months I'm also paying more on heating my home during the day.
So whilst I'm lucky to work from home it does have its own associated costs. I don't feel I should have to pay a tax because I wouldn't be paying into systems I wasn't paying into before.
It really stinks of "tax everyone except us, the bankers and landlords".
You can claim a tax allowance (a fixed amount) if you've had to work from home this year (but not if you've chosen to)
https://www.gov.uk/tax-relief-for-employees/working-at-home
offset by claiming tax deductable expenses for running a home office.
There is a legitimate calculation one can do to offest home running costs if you work from home, I did it for 12 years. simply, a proportion of home space/time x cost of running property . . .
So how exactly are remote workers contributing less to the infrastructure of the economy.? Utter bankers !
offset by claiming tax deductable expenses for running a home office.
There is a legitimate calculation one can do to offest home running costs if you work from home, I did it for 12 years. simply, a proportion of home space/time x cost of running property . . .
Self-employed though right?