Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Cricket] Sri Lanka vs England 2nd Test Kandy







dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
55,530
Burgess Hill
What uis the general opuinion of the final result Sri Lanka need 75 runs we need 3 wickets could go either way but I think the odds are slightly in our favour.

No need to think, just look the odds up.....

d3ebfb6b0fdb6e44c4562ab74c50ef41.jpg
 


GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,181
Gloucester
Which would cause quite a stir considering the five penalty runs taken from Sri Lanka in their 2nd innings for what the umpire deemed a deliberate short run!

What penalty runs taken from Sri Lanka?

Five penalty runs were added to England's first innings, but I hadn't heard about any further penalties.
 








dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
55,530
Burgess Hill
I wasnt thnking of the bookies odds or the views of acknowledged experts but more of the views of the ' experts' on here.

9/2 Sri Lanka looks better value than 1/5 England, but if I put a quid on Sri Lanka we’ll roll them over in the first 15 minutes [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
 








GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,181
Gloucester


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
55,530
Burgess Hill
No runs were deducted from Pakistan; every run they scored has counted. Check out the match scorecard. Even the article you mistakenly think supports your assertion points out that this did not happen:

"The umpires though, have ruled the short run intentional. England had five runs added to their first-innings total as a result, taking their score to 290."

Would be incredibly harsh to deduct runs from Pakistan [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]
 


Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,910
West Sussex
No runs were deducted from Pakistan; every run they scored has counted. Check out the match scorecard. Even the article you mistakenly think supports your assertion points out that this did not happen:

"The umpires though, have ruled the short run intentional. England had five runs added to their first-innings total as a result, taking their score to 290."
Deducted / added potato / tomato.
 












Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,910
West Sussex
Moeen Ali tempts the dangerous Dickwella into a drive... edge to Stokes at slip.

Eight down

3 men went to Mo...
 




Jul 20, 2003
20,680
Moeen strikes with the first ball after I wake up needing some gaviscon.

2 wickets left, 61 needed.


....and another!

240/9
 


Jul 20, 2003
20,680
Typical. Wake up feeling shit and think at least there's some cricket to watch (always add two wickets to the score)
 




Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,910
West Sussex
Sri Lanka 243 all out.

England WIN by 57 runs.

Jack Leach 5-83 :clap:

Moeen Ali 4-72 :clap2:

England WIN their first series in Sri Lanka since 2002 :clap2:

10th wicket partnerships of 60 and 40 prove decisive for England
 


Jul 20, 2003
20,680
....oh well, nearly 4 overs of play for me today.

Jolly good test match.

Telebox people confirm 38 wickets to spinners in test, a record.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here