Storer68
New member
The ball remained in play after Carroll had played it.
That's the problem - the goal is within the field of play so the ball would either have to go out for a throw in, free kick, or goal kick to give the ref time to examine any video.
Presumably there will only be a finite time for a ref to be able to examine this during the game (ie a minute after the incident) so the defending team could easily keep the ball in play for that time thereby making him unable to review the play.
And if the decision is not within the game then how long will clubs have to appeal - it could go on for months.
The problem here was that Carroll was between the ball and the officials and they can't give decisions that they didn't see.
That's the problem - the goal is within the field of play so the ball would either have to go out for a throw in, free kick, or goal kick to give the ref time to examine any video.
Presumably there will only be a finite time for a ref to be able to examine this during the game (ie a minute after the incident) so the defending team could easily keep the ball in play for that time thereby making him unable to review the play.
And if the decision is not within the game then how long will clubs have to appeal - it could go on for months.
The problem here was that Carroll was between the ball and the officials and they can't give decisions that they didn't see.