Tricky Dicky
New member
I don't know exactly what the Gatwick problem was but it is most likely an infrastructure problem (signalling, conducter rail etc). This is the responsibility of Network Rail. Southern have been receiving all the flack (and I'm not defending them, the information problem sounds horrendous). And thereby lies the problem of the privatised railway. There are contractual relationships ie legal agreements and financial penalties between the train and the track. Surely an integrated railway would be better placed to cope with this sort of problem.
I've been lucky, was off work yesterday and decided not to chance it this morning, so dealt with my meeting via teleconference and am now tucked up at my computer getting a report done. Tomorrow? Who knows?
PG
PS things must be bad if even Ernest is not sticking up for the railways
That may well all be true, but my contract (ticket) is with Southern - they are the delivery point of the service (or non-service as the case may be). Any contractual negotians that need to happen behind that are nothing to do with me. And, as I've said before, as you agree with, the very least they can do is supply USEFUL information, and there is just no excuse for that these days.