pearl
Well-known member
Starts well, then gets a little lost and confused, then comes back to some sense.
Also, his argument is equally misleading in points. For example, he states that the new OBS role will not be trained to the same level of track safety as a guard, and yet Southern have said the following in a letter to Mick Cash:
"Southern guarantees that traditional conductors will retain current competence and will guarantee that the second member of on board employees will be trained to a ‘safety competent’ level including track safety training, train evacuation, traction competence and full commercial route knowledge (excluding train dispatch)."
They key here is for Southern to guarantee that there will be an OBS on every service, just as there is a guard. If they are genuinely interested in keeping the second member of staff focused on passenger service then they should have no problem guaranteeing this.
However, we all know that it is the DFT calling the shots and not Southern.
the new OBS role will not be trained to the same level of safety as a guard, the OBS will be trained to a 'safety competent' level, not quite the same