Nibble
New member
- Jan 3, 2007
- 19,238
- Thread starter
- #181
I think what this thread illustrates, and quite graphically so, is that supporters of UKIP get a flavour of the argument but cannot get the substance of it. Which they will never do for one simple reason, UKIP are a reactionary party. They have no substance, they merely give a flavour of an argument. This is why I regard them as fools. Fools for reacting to the Conservative and Tory rhetoric. They see many things they don't like in the mainstream parties, as I do, but their reaction is to turn to pseudo politics, people who dabble in policy, people who dabble in party politics but are without substance. It's a natural reaction but shows perfectly that UKIP supporters don't actually have any ideas of their own. If they did they would not take on board the flimsy ideals of UKIP, they would question whether they are reacting to what they don't like. In other words, are they being pulled by UKIP or are they being pushed towards UKIP by the main political parties?
History has shown us many times over and continues to do so that any political entity that starts off on the foot of a stance against immigration do not get more moderate once they believe they have put in motion the cogs of their beliefs, in fact quite the opposite. Once they attain power this only serves to reinforce their belief that immigration is bad and they see their voting into power as an affirmation of their beliefs. And these are beliefs rather than solid policies. UKIP may seem benign at present but they are a dangerous party to subscribe to.
I regard UKIP supporters as fools, not as an argument for Labour, the left or Conservatives, the right, but as a singular argument against the water weak, and it is weak, stance of UKIP. I say the word fool in it's truest sense. I don't mean is as an insult, I mean that I believe you have been fooled.
Supporting UKIP is an "any port in a storm" stance to take and it's not defendable. It's understandable, it's almost, almost explainable but it is most certainly not an intelligent stance to take. Quite the opposite. They are a reactionary group. That may be fine while they are reacting against something you dislike. The day will come when they start to react against things you may care about, which they will as all reactionary groups that have attained any modicum of power or influence, I hope you have the same conviction against them as you do for them.
History has shown us many times over and continues to do so that any political entity that starts off on the foot of a stance against immigration do not get more moderate once they believe they have put in motion the cogs of their beliefs, in fact quite the opposite. Once they attain power this only serves to reinforce their belief that immigration is bad and they see their voting into power as an affirmation of their beliefs. And these are beliefs rather than solid policies. UKIP may seem benign at present but they are a dangerous party to subscribe to.
I regard UKIP supporters as fools, not as an argument for Labour, the left or Conservatives, the right, but as a singular argument against the water weak, and it is weak, stance of UKIP. I say the word fool in it's truest sense. I don't mean is as an insult, I mean that I believe you have been fooled.
Supporting UKIP is an "any port in a storm" stance to take and it's not defendable. It's understandable, it's almost, almost explainable but it is most certainly not an intelligent stance to take. Quite the opposite. They are a reactionary group. That may be fine while they are reacting against something you dislike. The day will come when they start to react against things you may care about, which they will as all reactionary groups that have attained any modicum of power or influence, I hope you have the same conviction against them as you do for them.
Last edited: