Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

[Technology] Some early deals on Amazon devices



Bozza

Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,292
Back in Sussex
A chance to beat the Christmas panic-buying, right?

Here >>> https://amzn.to/3DS9bdp

Echo Dot 3rd Gen £21.99
Echo Dot 4th Gen £29.99
Echo Dot 4th Gen with clock £39.99
Echo Dot 4th Gen kids £39.99
Echo Dot 4th Gen with Philips Hue smart bulb £64.99
Echo Flex £9.99

Echo Buds 2nd Gen £79.99

Echo Show 5 2nd Gen £44.99
Echo Show 8 1st Gen £59.99
Echo Show 8 2nd Gen £89.99

Fire HD 10 Kids Pro tablet £139.99

Fire TV stick lite £24.99
Fire TV stick £29.99
Fire TV stick 4k £34.99
Fire TV cube £79.99

Ring Video Doorbell Wired by Amazon + Echo Dot (3rd Gen) £44.00

plus some routers and cameras and stuff.

Here >>> https://amzn.to/3DS9bdp
 










crodonilson

crodonilson

He/Him
Jan 17, 2005
14,062
Lyme Regis
Bozza said:
Sorry - I got the prices wrong - the 4k is £34.99. It's the 4k Max that is £54.99.
Click to expand...

I need to upgrade my fire stick for my streaming of PL games through the TV, was going to go for the 4k but what does the 4k Max do that the 4k doesn't?
 




Bozza

Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,292
Back in Sussex
crodonilson said:
I need to upgrade my fire stick for my streaming of PL games through the TV, was going to go for the 4k but what does the 4k Max do that the 4k doesn't?
Click to expand...

My take on it, but I'm far from an expert, is that it just seems to be a bit more powerful!

Direct link here > https://amzn.to/2YKwupW

I'm not sure I can see why I'd pay more for it, but I'm sure someone will soon correct that if I'm missing something!
 
















W

Wardy's twin

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2014
8,867


McTavish

McTavish

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2014
1,587
Wardy's twin said:
Wonder if you could try that for a speed camera...

The judge has opened a can of worms with this - unless he has a camera pointed directly at her house to monitor her then I can't see what the issue is...
Click to expand...
A more balanced report here: https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/13/amazon_ring_audio_recording_data_protection/

Seems the main problems were the number of cameras, the lies about the cameras and the lies about the reason for the cameras, the audio and the weird behaviour which amounted to harassment.

Apart from that, yes, you can get fined £100,000 just for having a Ring doorbell...
 


Brian Potter

Brian Potter

Well-known member
Mar 5, 2006
1,004
All the way to the end of the A11 and then some!
McTavish said:
A more balanced report here: https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/13/amazon_ring_audio_recording_data_protection/

Seems the main problems were the number of cameras, the lies about the cameras and the lies about the reason for the cameras, the audio and the weird behaviour which amounted to harassment.

Apart from that, yes, you can get fined £100,000 just for having a Ring doorbell...
Click to expand...

Thanks, that does clarify things a bit. And I appreciate there was more to it than merely having a Ring doorbell. It does open up a discussion on the whole data protection issue with these cameras though. Theoretically, if I lived across the road from you, or within the camera's field of vision, could I then request all the data you hold showing images of me going about my life in view of your camera under the current legislation?
 




U

Uter

Well-known member
Aug 5, 2008
1,507
The land of chocolate
McTavish said:
A more balanced report here: https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/13/amazon_ring_audio_recording_data_protection/

Seems the main problems were the number of cameras, the lies about the cameras and the lies about the reason for the cameras, the audio and the weird behaviour which amounted to harassment.

Apart from that, yes, you can get fined £100,000 just for having a Ring doorbell...
Click to expand...

Sounds like a lovely chap:

He described him as aggressive from the start. He said the Defendant told him that he knew Thames Valley Police well, the police were laughing about this matter, he had total support from the neighbours as everyone felt safer with the technology he discussed. He says that the Defendant then launched into a diatribe about how he was an expert installer of camera equipment for billionaires, had technology that “even the Chinese have no access to” and could “hack things”. He said that he regularly installed hidden cameras
in restaurants and that Dr Franich was naïve to believe that anyone really respected regulations in regard to CCTV installation. Dr Franich says that the Defendant then began to talk about the Claimant, and said she could “go to Hell”, and if she did not like his cameras she could “go and live down the drain”. He said that if she did not like his current cameras, “she would enjoy some of his future surveillance projects even less” and that he was going to install cameras “good enough to see the colour of her eyes”
 


McTavish

McTavish

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2014
1,587
Brian Potter said:
Thanks, that does clarify things a bit. And I appreciate there was more to it than merely having a Ring doorbell. It does open up a discussion on the whole data protection issue with these cameras though. Theoretically, if I lived across the road from you, or within the camera's field of vision, could I then request all the data you hold showing images of me going about my life in view of your camera under the current legislation?
Click to expand...
I'm not an expert but... Yes, I believe that you could request everything that I had stored of you; recorded CCTV images from outside my own property are subject to GDPR. I would also need to ensure that any recordings that I handed over to you did not contain recognisable images of anyone else as that would breach their rights under GDPR.
 


S

Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,785
GOSBTS


schmunk

schmunk

Why oh why oh why?
Jan 19, 2018
10,355
Mid mid mid Sussex
McTavish said:
I'm not an expert but... Yes, I believe that you could request everything that I had stored of you; recorded CCTV images from outside my own property are subject to GDPR. I would also need to ensure that any recordings that I handed over to you did not contain recognisable images of anyone else as that would breach their rights under GDPR.
Click to expand...

Individuals are not subject to the GDPR, unless collecting/processing data for 'business' purposes.
 




McTavish

McTavish

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2014
1,587
schmunk said:
Individuals are not subject to the GDPR, unless collecting/processing data for 'business' purposes.
Click to expand...
As I said, I'm not an expert, but this suggests otherwise: https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...stic-cctv-using-cctv-systems-on-your-property particularly 3.4 and 3.6 which states:
Once you have installed your CCTV system, you should regularly check that you are complying with the GDPR and the DPA if your CCTV system captures images outside the boundaries of your home
 


schmunk

schmunk

Why oh why oh why?
Jan 19, 2018
10,355
Mid mid mid Sussex
McTavish said:
As I said, I'm not an expert, but this suggests otherwise: https://www.gov.uk/government/publi...stic-cctv-using-cctv-systems-on-your-property particularly 3.4 and 3.6 which states:
Once you have installed your CCTV system, you should regularly check that you are complying with the GDPR and the DPA if your CCTV system captures images outside the boundaries of your home
Click to expand...

Following the link:

"If you collect information about individuals for any reason other than your own personal, family or household purposes, you need to comply."
 


You must log in or register to reply here.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports

Share this page


Top
Link Here