Seemingly Unrealistic expectations is the answer.
Seems an appropriate place to ask this; why is a corner that is headed clear with ease by a defender on the near post considered to be a worse corner than one that is cleared with ease by a defender in the middle or at the far post? Worse than one that goes above a defender at the near post but is thus a nice height for a keeper to pluck out of the air?Worse than one that goes past everyone and out the other side for a throw/goal kick?
It seems to be a complaint levelled at the albion quite a lot over over the past probably 10 years (I imagine fans at other clubs also have similar complaints about their own teams). I feel there are two issues 1) Unrealistic expectations. I'm sure this was linked to late last season when it was a fresher article, but there's no harm in linking it again. Only around 3.2% of corners lead to a goal. Maybe we shouldn't expect a goal a game and pile in on a player who doesn't make it happen when we take just five of them. 2) It seems silly to spell it out (mainly because I keep thinking of Homer Simpson's "it takes two to lie, one to lie and the other to believe it"), but it takes at least two to make a a corner decent - the person taking it and the one who gets on the end of it. It doesn't matter where a corner is directed, with however much power, if none of our players get on the end of it. If our corner taker is constantly putting it on the head of the near post defender, why aren't any of our players making a run to that area to beat him to it?
We rely heavily on set pieces as our wide players and midfield do not create that many chances from open play in fact second worst in the league. Stat Brother will back that up.
That may well be true, but that doesn't answer the main question... Why do we get so hung up on corners that don't beat the first man, moreso than those that go flying over everyone and out for a goalkick, or right on the head of the third man, or seventh man? Why focus on the taker when they can be quite consistent in their corner taking and the outcome can be affected by other players in the box?
Problem is so many have to express every view or opinion as an extreme........rather than saying 'he wasn't at his best today' it's 'he was fecking awful'. Don't know why people feel the need.
Same goes for the scapegoating that goes on. There always has to be someone that's been a disaster on whom they can heap all the blame. It's bollocks.
Sent from my H8314 using Tapatalk
This is NSC, and probably all of social media in a nutshell. Applies to pretty much any subject.
Exactly, we should get rid. Now!3. Does not show emotion.
Had a really good game today.
TBH I didn't notice much difference today, to his "awful" performance v Arsenal.
I realised after writing that could have been misconstrued in many different ways.Far more aggression and intent to his attacking play today imo.
I realised after writing that could have been misconstrued in many different ways.
Most of us thought he's played well in both games.
Only one poster said he was "awful" (plus a special mention for 'he doesn't cry enough') and that most certainly wasn't you.