Tooting Gull
Well-known member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 11,033
But your assuming the delays are Knights fault. Maybe the club didn't have the money to be able to fast track the original proposal.
And what about the opposition to the ground, the lenghty public enquiries, the mistake by Prescott. - All things that Knight can't be held responsible for
With no truely suitable site available to the club to build the ground on, it was always going to be a hard and lenghty task to gain permission for building at Falmer, something that all those involved in getting permission should be proud of and are worthy of praise. Not abuse from 'fans' due to delays that were out of their control, surely the fact they gained permission shows just how good a case for they put together.
Because it has taken so long is not a reason for Knight to go.
I'm assuming nothing. I'm looking at who is in charge, and how long it has taken. All the rest is painful detail we are all too familiar with.