So what is Dean Wilkins thinking?

[Franks Wild Years]

I know what he did and let me tell you it aint pretty, oh no. And what's more he did it twice and considering he'd been warned after the first incident, doing it a second time was bound to end in tears. So what's he thinking now ? Well he's incapable of thinking, if he was able to think he'd never have done it in the first place let alone the second. Will he ever talk to the press ? No, and why ?
Well if he could talk he'd never have said those things he said, and as for compensation, Mr Wilkins would like everyone to know he's now passing regular firm stools.
Is there an inner
circle of fans? Yes there is. They meet in the upstairs room of the Coach and Sack on the third tuesday of every season including autumn. Do we on North Stand Chat have any sway on decisions made by THE BOARD ?
No we don't,we have no sway,
no sway hose.
What we do have is tiny cocks which vibrate with exitement when we hear of another poster
in the know,
in the loop,
in the soup,
up the duff,
round the bend,
on the mend,
SPEND SPEND SPEND.
And we did. More signings this season than Micheal Jackson at a peado's autograph fare there I've said it, where's the money gone? where's yer mamma gone?
Gone wrong gone wong I blame the Chinese, dirty knees Dick cheese d off with the questions.
Why ?
When ?
Where ?
Who ?
Dave Clarke Five ?
The Monkeys ?
I'm the King of the Swingers. No you're not Wilkins is and thats why he had to go, I told you I was in the know.
A Ford Fiesta up the Devils Dyke, she's a big girl. YOU CAN DO WHAT YOU LIKE (I've always fancied football managers) Keep it to yourself but you had to blab, straight round to Dick's (twice in one night) Keep it tight at the back and let the mid field push up. And he did it again, again and again I shouldn't snitch but one night on the pitch
the dirty bitch
led him to the hammer net lest we forget, the dirty git in the long jump pit
100 yards dash he'd been on the lash he had some cash he needed gash so feeling mean n being Dean he spread her legs like margarine quite obscene on the running track. I've been with Dean. WITHDEAN we've all been to Withdean
So there you are thats the facts. I speak the truth cos I am in the inner ring.
And so my friends was he.

 

[Questions]

The way it looks to me the whole thing was set up to make sure Wilkins was forced out of the club and the offer of a coaching job was just a publicity stunt.

Wilkins did not agree with Knight over certain matters concerning the O`Callaghan, Savage and Hammond issues and at that point Knight was always going to sack him. Since then TLO and all the other 'special fans'
have been drip fed all manner of crap about losing the dressing room, nervous breakdowns and all the rest of that sort of nonsense.

We were in seventh place (with a manager who was a raving loon and had lost all respect from the players) and now we are going down..............

Dick Knight can spin it any way he wants and there will be many who will believe him..................... but we WILL BE are in division 2.

If he takes the plaudits with his speeches on ''The great strikers I have brought to this club' then he must take the flack when he fucks up, and it is his fault we are where we are this season.


cue the inevitable HE SAVED US bollox

 

[Brovion]

But you don't know that, any more than any of us do.

No, we don't. However Bulldog's earlier question is still relevant - if what WIlkins did was SO terrible why wasn't he sacked on the spot, a bit like Yeovil did with Slade? Why was he allowed to continue even to the extent of doing the Retained list at the end of the season?

 

[Questions]

regular firm stools.


QUOTE]


Thats a fair point Frank

 

[British Bulldog]

But you don't know that, any more than any of us do.

I know I dont but until the club issues some kind of explanation to prove otherwise thats how it's allways going to look.

Dick Knight was obviously negotiating with Adams to take over behind Wilkins back.

Wilkins was given the job of releasing players then sacked himself the next day.

Adams re-signs Hart & Mayo after Wilkins released them.

Ian Chapman walks away from his first coaching job with a profesional club in support of Wilkins.

Looking from the outside in it does'nt look to me like they were making the coaching job very attractive for Wilkins to take.

 

[Skaville]

One question I would like to raise. Can you name any way in which this club has moved forward in the past 9 months (ignoring Falmer as that was already in motion)? I can only think of one thing - we have signed a decent left back on a permanent basis. Very little else seems to have gone right since the time DW left. I'm not saying he was necessarily the catalyst, just pointing out that very little has progressed in the past 9-12 months.

 

[London Pompous]

No, we don't. However Bulldog's earlier question is still relevant - if what WIlkins did was SO terrible why wasn't he sacked on the spot, a bit like Yeovil did with Slade? Why was he allowed to continue even to the extent of doing the Retained list at the end of the season?

I have no idea, just as you don't.

There are three reasons for employing someone

1. Do I like them
2. Do I trust them
3. Can they do the job

If you only satisfy two of those criteria, you end up getting the sack. It happened to Mourinho, who delivered Chelsea trophies, it happened to Wilkins and McGhee too.

 

[London Pompous]

One question I would like to raise. Can you name any way in which this club has moved forward in the past 9 months (ignoring Falmer as that was already in motion)? I can only think of one thing - we have signed a decent left back on a permanent basis. Very little else seems to have gone right since the time DW left. I'm not saying he was necessarily the catalyst, just pointing out that very little has progressed in the past 9-12 months.

I agree with you.

On a player by player basis

1: Existing players: Cox, Elphick, Kuipers El Abd, FDM, Loft and Robinson have gone backwards. Thomson has left. Forster same as last season. Lynch is in Forest's reserves, Murray has been missed when he is not playing. OGH and Mayo have through injury as much as anything else proven to be a big disappointment. Whing has been consistently good.

2. Adams signings: McLeod, Failure, Virgo, okay, Hawkins, failure, Birchall, undecided, Carole, undecided, Jarrett, flattered to deceive. McNulty's injury is a tragedy, Livermore failure.

3. Loan players have been a disappointment. I cant think of one who has consistently impressed.

 

[bristolseagull]

i saw him running along dyke road the other day

 

[Lokki 7]

If you only satisfy two of those criteria, you end up getting the sack. It happened to Mourinho, who delivered Chelsea trophies, it happened to Wilkins

Hang on, so you're saying that because Chelsea sacked Mourinho, it makes it ok for Knight to sack Wilkins? Firstly, I would say that I've never heard Abromovich taking about 'community stadiums' or even pretend that Chelsea are a family or caring sharing club. Knight has banged on about these issues for a decade yet conveniently ignores these factors when it suits him. Then secondly, and the more obvious response, is to look how successful Chelsea have been since making that EGOTISTICAL decision to sack a manager who dared even contemplate a different point of view from the chairman.

I know you are only playing devils advocate but your arguments smack of spin and desperation.

 

[Bry Nylon]

I know what he did and let me tell you it aint pretty, oh no. And what's more he did it twice and considering he'd been warned after the first incident, doing it a second time was bound to end in tears. So what's he thinking now ? Well he's incapable of thinking, if he was able to think he'd never have done it in the first place let alone the second. Will he ever talk to the press ? No, and why ?
Well if he could talk he'd never have said those things he said, and as for compensation, Mr Wilkins would like everyone to know he's now passing regular firm stools.
Is there an inner
circle of fans? Yes there is. They meet in the upstairs room of the Coach and Sack on the third tuesday of every season including autumn. Do we on North Stand Chat have any sway on decisions made by THE BOARD ?
No we don't,we have no sway,
no sway hose.
What we do have is tiny cocks which vibrate with exitement when we hear of another poster
in the know,
in the loop,
in the soup,
up the duff,
round the bend,
on the mend,
SPEND SPEND SPEND.
And we did. More signings this season than Micheal Jackson at a peado's autograph fare there I've said it, where's the money gone? where's yer mamma gone?
Gone wrong gone wong I blame the Chinese, dirty knees Dick cheese d off with the questions.
Why ?
When ?
Where ?
Who ?
Dave Clarke Five ?
The Monkeys ?
I'm the King of the Swingers. No you're not Wilkins is and thats why he had to go, I told you I was in the know.
A Ford Fiesta up the Devils Dyke, she's a big girl. YOU CAN DO WHAT YOU LIKE (I've always fancied football managers) Keep it to yourself but you had to blab, straight round to Dick's (twice in one night) Keep it tight at the back and let the mid field push up. And he did it again, again and again I shouldn't snitch but one night on the pitch
the dirty bitch
led him to the hammer net lest we forget, the dirty git in the long jump pit
100 yards dash he'd been on the lash he had some cash he needed gash so feeling mean n being Dean he spread her legs like margarine quite obscene on the running track. I've been with Dean. WITHDEAN we've all been to Withdean
So there you are thats the facts. I speak the truth cos I am in the inner ring.
And so my friends was he.

Outstanding.

 

[driller]

One question I would like to raise. Can you name any way in which this club has moved forward in the past 9 months (ignoring Falmer as that was already in motion)? I can only think of one thing - we have signed a decent left back on a permanent basis. Very little else seems to have gone right since the time DW left. I'm not saying he was necessarily the catalyst, just pointing out that very little has progressed in the past 9-12 months.

A left back that will have a get out clause if (when) we go down

 

[driller]

One question I would like to raise. Can you name any way in which this club has moved forward in the past 9 months (ignoring Falmer as that was already in motion)? I can only think of one thing - we have signed a decent left back on a permanent basis. Very little else seems to have gone right since the time DW left. I'm not saying he was necessarily the catalyst, just pointing out that very little has progressed in the past 9-12 months.

Read my post again. I said I will not post it on here.

Not harping on about it, just fed up of reading so many people believing that Wilkins being sacked for taking us to seventh. It is, on so many levels, a ridiculous notion.

so where will you post it??

 

[The Large One]

Not sure why you quoted JS, but if it's catalysts you're talking about, beer helps...

 

[bhadeb]

I know I dont but until the club issues some kind of explanation to prove otherwise thats how it's allways going to look.

Dick Knight was obviously negotiating with Adams to take over behind Wilkins back.

Wilkins was given the job of releasing players then sacked himself the next day.

Adams re-signs Hart & Mayo after Wilkins released them.

Ian Chapman walks away from his first coaching job with a profesional club in support of Wilkins.

Looking from the outside in it does'nt look to me like they were making the coaching job very attractive for Wilkins to take.

Wilkins and Chapman would NOT have walked away from this club without very good reason

 

[cjd]

Seeing as you don't know what what I have been told, by whom, how pertinent it is etc, you're not really in a position to comment.

I,m a bit late joining this particular thread..............However, you have stated that you have enquired about "Wilkinsgate" and have been told what happened.

Even if you cannot tell us what the reasons for Wilkins dismissal were, perhaps you can at least tell us your source....?

It has been blatantly obvious, that recently, some of the FFA team who post on here,(and have probably been in communication with, and closer to, Dick Knight more than most) are very very supportive of Dick Knight.

It has also been blatantly obvious, that more than one of the FFA team, who post on here, have cast veiled aspersions on the Blooms.

Where on earth would these doubts eminate from...?

Are the FFA team also watching what the Blooms do....? Or are they being fed information from the same source, who is giving information about Wilkins sacking...?

 

[vulture]

I,m a bit late joining this particular thread..............However, you have stated that you have enquired about "Wilkinsgate" and have been told what happened.

Even if you cannot tell us what the reasons for Wilkins dismissal were, perhaps you can at least tell us your source....?

It has been blatantly obvious, that recently, some of the FFA team who post on here,(and have probably been in communication with, and closer to, Dick Knight more than most) are very very supportive of Dick Knight.

It has also been blatantly obvious, that more than one of the FFA team, who post on here, have cast veiled aspersions on the Blooms.

Where on earth would these doubts eminate from...?

Are the FFA team also watching what the Blooms do....? Or are they being fed information from the same source, who is giving information about Wilkins sacking...?

Colin,

The only sauce this bloke has is the ones that go into his many burgers he eats every day at mcdonalds

 

[The Large One]

Colin,

The only sauce this bloke has is the ones that go into his many burgers he eats every day at mcdonalds

You've changed your tune.

 

[BALDISBEAUTIFUL]

Dick Knight and the board have f***ed up bigTime. Adams just finished the job.

 

[vulture]

You've changed your tune.

Its a joke Alan,we all know you do have contacts at the clu b and I believe you 100% but whats the point saying I know on here then saying I cant say.