Is the Watkins option dead in the water? Haven’t seen confirmation he’s gone to Villa.
I watched that analysis.
It was about Pukki losing form, I don’t think his teammates were blamed, in fact, they showed a number of situations where had he made the run, he’d have been in great positions.
You get these Strikers who have a good year or two; he is one of them but his time has gone.
He is 30 and was relegated completely out of form to the Championship (where he belongs) where as 20 yr old Connolly finished the season brightly. I’ll take the latter thanks.
Exactly.Watching Finland beat Ireland yesterday, Pukki looked far better than Connolly whose touch was poor.
He's only young and in the future I hope he will be great, but for now, in our situation, with the team we have, Pukki would be a better option. Even at 30.
Watching Finland beat Ireland yesterday, Pukki looked far better than Connolly whose touch was poor.
He's only young and in the future I hope he will be great, but for now, in our situation, with the team we have, Pukki would be a better option. Even at 30.
Exactly.
If pukki was Brazilian and or played for a fashionable club most posters would be falling over themselves to sign him.
Pukki has scored more in one season in the premier League than giroud in the last two combined!! (And think how many chances Chelsea create)
Sent from my SM-G977N using Tapatalk
Yeah that hattrick he knocked in was mightily impressive.
On no wait he hasn't actually scored, or assisted in, a goal since 22/01/20
So I guess we can say on that level he'd fit right in.
Care to guess how many Pukki scored over the same fixtures?
You are naughty - that did make me LoL.
I think the bigger issue is more his Pukki’s presence, I understand what you are quoting re Giroud, but one more assist or not, he is a physical presence, that will occupy defences, and free-up Maupay more.
Never going to run the lines though like Connolly and Maupay, but he would be a Murray replacement - literally [emoji23]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What is in 'never getting into the team so offloaded to Watford', then yes we agree.
Oh and Giroud is proper shitehouse, only a Chelsea fanboy would even bring him into the conversation.
But I'd take him in a heartbeat over Pukki.
I'd rather the club bought a Pukka Pie rather than Pukki.
A World Cup winner is shitehouse and wouldn’t improve us? Get a grip Stat.
Won't be long now .
Yeah that hattrick he knocked in was mightily impressive.
On no wait he hasn't actually scored, or assisted in, a goal since 22/01/20
So I guess we can say on that level he'd fit right in.
But if the club keep going down the West Ham Recruitment route then we's in trouble.
:
Touche.
Its all moot, But if offered a choice between what we have now or the addition of Pukki, I'd take the latter.
I've not noticed us selling our bright young talent to rivals this window and our captain criticising it openly on social media but if you say so SB.
Would that be the same Giroud who scored 10 goals in 1831 minutes over, 2 seasons.
Versus
Pukki who scored 11 goals in 2893 minutes in just one season, with one assist LESS than Giroud.
The same Giroud who last season came off the bench to score 8 in the last 12 games.
Care to guess how many Pukki scored over the same fixtures?
If Pukki was Brazilian he'd be shite in yellow for club and country. (not that he'd ever be within 1000 miles of their national team)
Anyway for all he did in that World Cup his medal wouldn't look out of place round either yours or my neck