Caveman
Well-known member
- Jul 14, 2003
- 9,926
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;5396550 said:Do you really not think Crofty will come good?
...and unfair on Hoskins imo
Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ;5396550 said:Do you really not think Crofty will come good?
Dickinson is what, 18? Bit harsh to include him in the poll.
SHIT signings:
Dobbie, Hoskins, CMS (based on the fee), Harley, Lopez, Hammond, Crofts, Sandaza, Holroyd, Hendrie, Arismendi, Vincelot, Baz, Battipiedi, Paynter, Reyes (2nd time round), Carole, Naisbitt (who), Gonzalez, Assulin, Razak, Bergkamp, Agdestein, Poke
Good signings:
Greer, Painter, Calderon, Ankergren, Kuzczak, Bruno, Bridge, Mattock, Noone, Buckley, LuaLua, Barnes, Bridcutt, Kishishev
somewhere inbetween - everyone else
How has Orlandi got more votes than Greer? God, people are so thick.
Dickinson is what, 18? Bit harsh to include him in the poll.
SHIT signings:
Dobbie, Hoskins, CMS (based on the fee), Harley, Lopez, Hammond, Crofts, Sandaza, Holroyd, Hendrie, Arismendi, Vincelot, Baz, Battipiedi, Paynter, Reyes (2nd time round), Carole, Naisbitt (who), Gonzalez, Assulin, Razak, Bergkamp, Agdestein, Poke
Good signings:
Greer, Painter, Calderon, Ankergren, Kuzczak, Bruno, Bridge, Mattock, Noone, Buckley, LuaLua, Barnes, Bridcutt, Kishishev
somewhere inbetween - everyone else
16 for me .... oh my :/
Not sure how anyone can get that low. I went for 25 and thought that was low. Surely all 7 defenders should get a yes from everyone, in goal Brezovan, Ankergren and Kuszczak have all done a good job for us so that is 10 already. In midfield, Bridcutt, Kishishev, Orlandi, Noone and Buckley all seem obvious. Vicente is debatable but just seeing him play for us last season was enough to say yes while Sparrow and Vincelot both did a good job for us last season considering they were free/cheap. Hammond I also think has done well and I also put LuaLua down. Up front, it is hard to argue that Barnes has been a good signing considering how much he cost. Wood got 10 goals for us on loan which was very good and considering Sandaza/Agdestein were free/cheap, I think they have done enough to make them good signings. The controversial one is CMS but I think he has done okay and it sounds like there is a fair chance we will get our money back.
Of the rest, a lot were loans/free transfer gambles and I am confident that the likes of Crofts, Dobbie, Lopez and Hoskins will be better in the second half of the season. It is certainly not worth writing them off as bad signings yet.
Seriously, how can you say Naisbitt was a shit signing? He was brought in as cover in case of injuries. There were no injuries so he didn't feature.
Sandaza did what he was brought in for and scored a couple of crucial goals, Hammond has done enough to be in the somewhere inbetween (if not good signings) list, Vincelot did enough last year for the £100K we paid to be in the ok/good signings. Most of the rest were free transfer gambles or loan signings so hardly fair to compare while most of this summer's signings should be given time rather than written off already.
I went for,
Peter Brezovan
Steve Harper
Tomasz Kuszczak
Inigo Calderon
Gordon Greer
Joe Mattock
Bruno
Wayne Bridge
Radostin Kishishev
Liam Bridcutt
Abdul Razak
Andrea Orlandi
Craig Noone
Will Buckley
Kazenga LuaLua
Ashley Barnes
Chris Wood
Will Hoskins
Manage to up it to 18.
Justify why you haven't included Painter.
Did you not have a S/T at Withdean?
For our own players (not loan) I've gone for their whole time with us not just based on 1 season.
For our own players (not loan) I've gone for their whole time with us not just based on 1 season.
So you're saying the bloke who started EVERY league game in a side that went up as champions and was probably the most reliable left-back that we had during the Withdean Years was not a good signing? Not to mention that whenever he's been called upon in the Championship he's given steady performances.
Just because he's not the the left-back we need to get us out of this division doesn't mean he wasn't a GOOD signing. He was signed as a left-back to get us out of League One and to help us compete in the Championship - he's done that - therefore a good signing.
If you can't see that you've got seriously blinkered judgement of what constitutes a good signing. Either that or you've got an irrational dislike for Painter.