portlock seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,777
Are you making it up as you go along?
That several of them in photo are STHs in North stand at the Amex too?
Are you making it up as you go along?
That’s not exactly fair when you’ve revealed your relation (son? Nephew?) is one of the culprits. You appear to want to discredit the OP and laugh it off when really, a more responsible father, uncle etc would be having strong words with the accused given multiple persons have seen these individuals behaving like pricks at Albion matches. Even if it’s only to pass on a general rebuke by proxy. Slightly concerning that you’re condoning such behaviour - instead, I’d be ashamed.
Seems strange the OP has also changed his story on who exactly saw the alleged spitting .
He first said his daughter saw it, he then said " it was seen by all of us " ,
Typical Tory keyboard bully and online troll
That several of them in photo are STHs in North stand at the Amex too?
That’s not exactly fair when you’ve revealed your relation (son? Nephew?) is one of the culprits. You appear to want to discredit the OP and laugh it off when really, a more responsible father, uncle etc would be having strong words with the accused given multiple persons have seen these individuals behaving like pricks at Albion matches. Even if it’s only to pass on a general rebuke by proxy. Slightly concerning that you’re condoning such behaviour - instead, I’d be ashamed.
When I had one of these belltards kick me in the back at Anfield last season I found a quick punch on the nose calmed him down,
Pissed as he was he got the message.
That’s not exactly fair when you’ve revealed your relation (son? Nephew?) is one of the culprits. You appear to want to discredit the OP and laugh it off when really, a more responsible father, uncle etc would be having strong words with the accused given multiple persons have seen these individuals behaving like pricks at Albion matches. Even if it’s only to pass on a general rebuke by proxy. Slightly concerning that you’re condoning such behaviour - instead, I’d be ashamed.
Top post.
The relentless posts of a desparate relative, with second hand 'knowledge', questioning the integrity of the OP's account, has been cringeworthy.
We do have some proper dribbling fannies in our support.
You are correct, I agree, but do lads that are 20 years old and younger think that way?
We could say, why didn't the OP or one of his group find a steward at half time to report bad behaviour.
Oh please shut up talking twaddle.
I am trying to get the facts, my relative has had two photos posted on here with the OP saying it's this group. ( photos now removed)
I have asked him about the opening post, he has denied spitting and hitting anyone.
The OP has also changed his story twice, once about who saw the ' spitting ' He also said he didn't complain about swearing, it's clearly in the first line of the opening post.
Leave the process to those who were there FIRST HAND .
We do have some proper dribbling fannies in our support.
No, but perhaps that's why they need a talking to, rather than engaging in hypothetical 'are you certain they were all involved' kind of defences.
I think it's fair that I try and find out if my family member was actually involved, seeing as his photo has been posted, twice for all to see.