Is anybody suggesting he should be?
Yes the OP has, or have I missed the point of this thread?
Is anybody suggesting he should be?
Is he not suggesting what they can do rather than put them in the team or on the bench or have I misinterpreted it.
IMO,these players are key,to our survial ! Removing them both would allow us to bring in 2 "provan ?" attackers,a striker and winger.Depending on Sidwells injury,a third adition in midfield .
Davie Provan? :lol
Murphy: at least can run at players well, with the ball, and works hard defensively (plus has a decent shot on him).
Skalak: can at least put in a decent ball, occasionally.
Izquierdo is so..... absent.
Knocky and March are simply off form and we've stuck with them both for a while now. People will say Murphy and Skalak aren't good enough but like Knocky and March they had plenty of good games in the Championship, so what gives?
Murphy: at least can run at players well, with the ball, and works hard defensively (plus has a decent shot on him).
Skalak: can at least put in a decent ball, occasionally.
Izquierdo is so..... absent.
Knocky and March are simply off form and we've stuck with them both for a while now. People will say Murphy and Skalak aren't good enough but like Knocky and March they had plenty of good games in the Championship, so what gives?
Don't rate Skalak, not good enough in open play. I am surprised Murphy has dropped out of the picture, more than good enough to do a job off the bench.
Neither are good enough, simple as. Murphy has talent but not the bottle to use it. His crossing is abysmal as is his decision making. With a bit of luck he'll be off to Scotland in the window. Skalak might as well return home. Wasn't bothered in the cups so shouldn't get a sniff at a seat on the bench.
As for the OP's assertion that Murphy has a great shot, can he remind us of examples?