Somethingdean
Well-known member
- May 18, 2019
- 129
We need sensible coalition governance so I'll be voting Reform so they can temper and offset Labour's loony left communistic tendency.
A Labour-Reform coalition government yeah?We need sensible coalition governance so I'll be voting Reform so they can temper and offset Labour's loony left communistic tendency.
If anyone can, the Labour Party can.
Meaning?We need sensible coalition governance so I'll be voting Reform so they can temper and offset Labour's loony left communistic tendency.
Tbf Labour have to beat both the right wing press *and* FPTP, the odds are almost always in the Conservatives favour until they f*** up so badly.Is there any political party with a more distinguished history of f***ing it up royally?
I'm sure the right on Guardian will help balance the books!Tbf Labour have to beat both the right wing press *and* FPTP, the odds are almost always in the Conservatives favour until they f*** up so badly.
I get your point that few will obtain and sit down and read the manifesto cover to cover BUT it will be read indirectly via press coverage and various other outlets, interviews etc. Once it is finalised and released there will be plenty of 'talk'.A bit of a silly tweet IMHO. Who reads a party manifesto? Virtually no one. If labour do have policies (that have substance, rather than just meaningless soundbites) then why don't they talk about them? Starmer had the perfect opportunity yesterday.
Guardian readership or sales = 250,000.I'm sure the right on Guardian will help balance the books!
If that's what the masses want.......Guardian readership or sales = 250,000.
Sun/Mail/Express/Telegraph/Times readership or sales = several million.
The arse analogy is quite apt but I'd argue that the Tory party we've had for the last thirteen or so years is the rancid, dripping, stinking brown eye in the middle rather than one of the cheeks.What a dismal choice - more Tory cruelty, divisiveness and Culture Wars, or Tory-lite Labour under Starmer and Reeves.
Two cheeks of the same arse.
I think even you know we're headed for a Starmer SpellShirley you haven't given up campaigning in the hope of Sunak turning it round ? Because that would mean the Tories are in REAL trouble
2005 election Labour had 355 seats with 1% lower vote than Conservatives got in 2010 for 309 seats. dont say FPTP favors one party when the evidence clearly shows otherwise. it certainly favours larger parties, as we see with SNP dominating Scotland seats since 2015. thats what will harm Labour, the Scottish ~50 seats they used to get and need to win back for a decent majority.Tbf Labour have to beat both the right wing press *and* FPTP, the odds are almost always in the Conservatives favour until they f*** up so badly.
correct, I'd say FPTP favours both the Tories and Labour....to be honest it favours whoever wins and I imagine Labour will do pretty well out of it at the next election,2005 election Labour had 355 seats with 1% lower vote than Conservatives got in 2010 for 309 seats. dont say FPTP favors one party when the evidence clearly shows otherwise. it certainly favours larger parties, as we see with SNP dominating Scotland seats since 2015. thats what will harm Labour, the Scottish ~50 seats they used to get and need to win back for a decent majority.
I have read sections on their website and it’s heavy on what they will do but very little on (meaningful) how.I get your point that few will obtain and sit down and read the manifesto cover to cover BUT it will be read indirectly via press coverage and various other outlets, interviews etc. Once it is finalised and released there will be plenty of 'talk'.
Or are told, every day of the week, every year (by billionaire-owned newspapers), that anything else is 'Communist', of course that's what they will want!If that's what the masses want.......
If Reform or whatever they are calling themselves this week get 1 or 2 seats they will be doing well. Even with Farage they failed 7 times to win a seatA Labour-Reform coalition government yeah?