JackB247
Well-known member
A classic of the genre: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/09/27/blair-brown-consensus-rules-britain-sunak-crush-it/With all due respect she's not doing an Alastair Heath from the Telegraph...
A classic of the genre: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/09/27/blair-brown-consensus-rules-britain-sunak-crush-it/With all due respect she's not doing an Alastair Heath from the Telegraph...
Fair assessment. You're never going to get a spectacular speech from Starmer. I think you're right to highlight the building pledge, which is the new policy area that has come out of this conference, and will certainly help in delivering growth -- which is their most ambitious mission and, up until this point, I thought it was a bit of a hostage to fortune. But the build combined with the clean energy mission does point towards substantial rises in two large sectors that will stoke the economy.Thought it was a good, if unspectacular speech, but let's face it, that's all it needs to be with the Government record over recent times.
As a young person who needs to get on the property ladder at some point, it was good to see the house building pledge.
i hope he comes through with delivery on homes and development. Starmer will have to move swiftly on changing planning early before the nimby lobby get in and change ministers minds.Thought it was a good, if unspectacular speech, but let's face it, that's all it needs to be with the Government record over recent times.
As a young person who needs to get on the property ladder at some point, it was good to see the house building pledge.
Depends how he set the business up, doesn’t it?Earning 150K per year, believe me he will have paid tax. If it makes you feel better, he may not have paid himself anything more than a few thousand through PAYE so as to avoid having to pay the NI, but his corp tax would've been 19% and then personal income tax on top of that would've put his effective top rate at about 45%. And that's not even accounting for the dry bumming you get in the 100-125K range.
I hope I'm not a member of the Nimby lobby myself. But did he say where all the new homes would be built? And is this all normal private sector stuff -- Taylor Wimpey, Persimmon etc., or did he include government-funded social housing? Labour have been complaining about the lack of social housing for years so I hope this is included in the plan.i hope he comes through with delivery on homes and development. Starmer will have to move swiftly on changing planning early before the nimby lobby get in and change ministers minds.
It was covered in the speech but not in much detail, ie specific mention of infrastructure alongside the new towns/house building. The figure of new houses was 1.5m which, presumably, means 300,000 a year in a parliament. Also mentioned was 'greyfield' -- ie, not greenfield -- sites, eg disused car parks, supermarkets, refuse sites, etcI hope I'm not a member of the Nimby lobby myself. But did he say where all the new homes would be built? And is this all normal private sector stuff -- Taylor Wimpey, Persimmon etc., or did he include government-funded social housing? Labour have been complaining about the lack of social housing for years so I hope this is included in the plan.
Just a word of warning: pretty much every government and opposition in my lifetime (about 12 general elections) has promised to build more houses. It never happens in the promied numbers.The issue is often infrastructure. It's not just new housing estates needed but roads and schools and shops and the need to supply gas and water that's been the obstacles. But here's hoping they have some new solutions to these problems.
Nor will field after field built on by the companies you mention bring the cost of homes down, the biggest challenge is affordable housing as part planning being circumnavigated by developers post planning!I hope I'm not a member of the Nimby lobby myself. But did he say where all the new homes would be built? And is this all normal private sector stuff -- Taylor Wimpey, Persimmon etc., or did he include government-funded social housing? Labour have been complaining about the lack of social housing for years so I hope this is included in the plan.
Just a word of warning: pretty much every government and opposition in my lifetime (about 12 general elections) has promised to build more houses. It never happens in the promied numbers.The issue is often infrastructure. It's not just new housing estates needed but roads and schools and shops and the need to supply gas and water that's been the obstacles. But here's hoping they have some new solutions to these problems.
these are just excuses to block "this development", often included in larger developments. he does mention roads and infrastucture, they will be built too once the planning is overhauled. i'd assume Labour will want more social and change the rules on councils building too. as you say, it's always promised but consecutive governments fail because they wont change planning to allow the investment to flow.I hope I'm not a member of the Nimby lobby myself. But did he say where all the new homes would be built? And is this all normal private sector stuff -- Taylor Wimpey, Persimmon etc., or did he include government-funded social housing? Labour have been complaining about the lack of social housing for years so I hope this is included in the plan.
Just a word of warning: pretty much every government and opposition in my lifetime (about 12 general elections) has promised to build more houses. It never happens in the promied numbers.The issue is often infrastructure. It's not just new housing estates needed but roads and schools and shops and the need to supply gas and water that's been the obstacles. But here's hoping they have some new solutions to these problems.
i hope he comes through with delivery on homes and development. Starmer will have to move swiftly on changing planning early before the nimby lobby get in and change ministers minds.
I confess I missed this part of the speech
I’d have expected it of Boris, but not him…
He was from People Demand Democracy so, no not likely.Poor Keir he looked petrified and appeared to cacking himself, but managed to just hang in there, was that guy a Tory?
Okay, you're probably right then!He was from People Demand Democracy so, no not likely.
BBC’s Nick Eardley in conversation this morning was clear that Labour plan to water down what’s deemed Green Belt. Building 1.5m homes every 5 years CANNOT be achieved on the nimbies favourite cop out expression Brownfield sites.
Green Belt in planning acts, post 1918?, was literally defined as the loops of countryside around major conurbations.
Manipulated since by vote chasing local and national politicians as carte blanche to block or delay schemes for epochs.
People have got to live somewhere, our population increased by an unprecedented 9.5m since 1997. Labour owe this to homeless millions.
It’ll be interesting to see what Labour voters say where plans to expand their towns onto fields transpire.
Yep. We have four new estates going up around Faversham, and more planning propose. It is all commercial building, with big houses crammed onto small plots, no new local services, no new main roads, all traffic funnelling into existing roads. There was no 'planning' involved. The latest wheeze is to build on the marsh, with sewage funneled into 'existing structures'. It is all bollocks.I hope I'm not a member of the Nimby lobby myself. But did he say where all the new homes would be built? And is this all normal private sector stuff -- Taylor Wimpey, Persimmon etc., or did he include government-funded social housing? Labour have been complaining about the lack of social housing for years so I hope this is included in the plan.
Just a word of warning: pretty much every government and opposition in my lifetime (about 12 general elections) has promised to build more houses. It never happens in the promied numbers.The issue is often infrastructure. It's not just new housing estates needed but roads and schools and shops and the need to supply gas and water that's been the obstacles. But here's hoping they have some new solutions to these problems.
Yep. We have four new estates going up around Faversham, and more planning propose. It is all commercial building, with big houses crammed onto small plots, no new local services, no new main roads, all traffic funnelling into existing roads. There was no 'planning' involved. The latest wheeze is to build on the marsh, with sewage funneled into 'existing structures'. It is all bollocks.
Labour will need to tackle the nimbies (with laws - look at how the Chinese do it and subtract the killing), and tackle the local authorities so that housing 'estates' are more than rabbit hutches.
The biggest problem with housebuilding is still the London black hole dragging in everything for miles. Moving the BBC to Manchester was a good move, but building a new Parliamentary building in Preston would be far better. Until we move some seriously major functions out of London the problem will remain the same.
There's only one relatively small area of the country that is short of land
Labour faces multi-million pound bill in ex-Jeremy Corbyn staff court case
A long-running internal party feud is putting an increasing strain on Labour's election finances.www.bbc.co.uk
Stormy weather approaching ?