Cheshire Cat
The most curious thing..
Prat.
That was supposed to be replying the post 1 on this thread - clicked the wrong button.Prat.
Alton Towers scenario ??...Several people badly injured,no one killed.......There are many people killed (sadly fairly often) from train crashes due to Driver or other human error.
I dont generally reply to threads about politics on here anymore, seeing this as an exercise in pointlessness. However having read a bunch of people talking nonsense about the lives of others, when they have no idea what these lives would be like is irritating. Particularly when the original poster believes imprisoning should be an option. So I thought perhaps the words of someone going on strike about why he is doing it, may help you understand.
http://www.london24.com/news/transport/a_tube_drive_explains_why_he_s_striking_1_4144229
I wont waste time sharing the evidence of the appalling effects that long term night working has upon someones physical and mental health, as I doubt you'd care.
Have a nice day
Are you talking globally or are you genuinely saying that people are often killed by trains, in Britain, due to driver error?Alton Towers scenario ??...Several people badly injured,no one killed.......There are many people killed (sadly fairly often) from train crashes due to Driver or other human error.
Do you always try to make things personal when your views are challenged?
I bet it works quite often.
But I assume the either have to live in London with its high housing costs, or commute in? The latter may not work if they are doing shifts.
I've just looked at a few pages from the other thread, and it is a right binfest.
My issue isn't whether or not they are striking. It's about where my sympathies lie. Yes, they're being asked to drastically change work patterns. That will impact their lives and if they haven't been consulted properly then strike action is inevitable. I'd still suggest that shifting the business to a 24-hour operation is a business decision and that TFL will need to recruit more drivers to cover that. If existing employees are being forced into changes of conditions then they have every right to strike. I'm not against that.
My issue is more around where I feel macro-priorities should lie (and I'm not saying changes to conditions aren't a dangerous precedent). Personally, I feel that roles within teaching and nursing - as two examples - bring with them the need for significant amounts of intellectual skill. They need to be rewarded with more. Much more. At the end of the day, what you're rewarded does matter. It pays for things. And as the government is now bringing in a tax on children that matters. So when I look at priorities, I find it hard to get over-sympathetic.
The 'Man' does get away with it all the time. Why are people in this country not angrier about that. If the tube drivers can get angry and organised, why aren't the people for whom society should feel support do the same. The divide between rich and poor has never been sharper.
A Tube driver's starting salary - which follows about six months of training - is £49,673, according to Transport for London (TfL), which adds that this "doesn't alter depending on length of time in role". They typically work a 36-hour week and get 43 days of leave every year, including bank holidays. Six of the days off are compensation for working 36, rather than 35, hours a week throughout the year.
Now, is this enough?
My concern is with those working in conditions where we aren't even paying the living wage. My concern is with those in nursing and teaching where salaries are both a deterrent to attracting the talent we need and basically unfair. My concern is about us penalising the poorest in society whilst the HMRC fails to collect tax from Major Corporates that are raking in millions.
I'm finding it hard to drum up much sympathy for the drivers at this stage.
Are you aware it wasn't just drivers withdrawing their labour today?
Signalling,line controllers,emergency response units,power supply and station staff all voted(98% of an 81% turnout) in favour of industrial action,that's over 15 thousand people standing together and saying NO BORIS.
As an aside,within the coming weeks 327 people could decide on whether we bomb Syria or 327 people could decide to reintroduce ripping apart a wild animal with packs of dogs.
I would say that if workers are to have certain rights then those rights should apply universally and be enforceable by law. Employment law does that job, and it is based on independent moral reasoning
They are given free travel passes, so they don't have to pay for their daily commute either
Don't be envious aspire Si…As an aside,within the coming weeks 327 people could decide on whether we bomb Syria or 327 people could decide to reintroduce ripping apart a wild animal with packs of dogs.
Which, if true, will be taxed as a benefit in kind.They are given free travel passes, so they don't have to pay for their daily commute either
Don't be envious aspire Si…
Oh and since when did u give a shit about war and hunting, I remember you as a frustrated RP wishing he had some action lol
They must have press ganged u down the mile with kings shilling, anyway I can sense your getting a little sensitive so bid you good nightx