severnside gull
Well-known member
Frightens the life out of me that the original question has even been asked.
Like being in a time warp back to the 19th century
Like being in a time warp back to the 19th century
You know how much you get not how much you are worth .....There`s a lot of people doing more deserving jobs than you for a lot less money...Not everyone hides behind a union...
"The unions rejected a "final" pay offer from LU which included a 2% rise this year and £2,000 for drivers on the weekend night Tube service. The typical salary for a Tube driver is £50,000 a year, the RMT said, but the unions maintain the new plans would be disruptive to their members' lives. They claim some employees are concerned they will have to work more overnight shifts"
£50k for driving a train isn't enough! They're getting an above inflation pay rise & a payment of £2,000. And basically they're concerned they might have to work extra overnight shifts. Absolute joke.
You know what, if I don't like my job I get another one. Why don't they go & get a new job if they don't like this one. Ah that's right, they can't because they don't have any other skills.
Driving a train has got to be one of the easiest jobs around....you go forwards on a track,stopping at stations...Driving a bus must be harder you have to steer aswell and remember your route...Do Bus Drivers get £50k...I doubt it ..
Jealous? On this thread I've been accused of not caring about working class people, of abhorrent views, and even being a banker. I'll add jealousy to that list, though unsure what I have to be jealous about
What's a banker out of interest ? The cashier in your local branch on 20k a year getting hammered daily for not meeting sales targets and doing loads of unpaid overtime ? The ops person doing long shifts in tiny cubicle in a dingy office on the arse-end of an industrial estate for less than that ? Like it or not these types form a large % of the millions of employees in the industry in the UK, not the relatively small % of selfish (massively overpaid) goons with their noses in the trough who were allowed to mess things up so very badly..........
Don't ask me. Ask the guy who said I was a banker.
51k a year for Me,37 hour week,just over 2 years training for the position I now hold,responsible for the lives of thousands of people,at present contracted to work between the hours of 0445 and 0130 for a shift not exceeding 8 hours,there is currently a TFL recruitment drive for station assistants,as you say "nice work"but I doubt you'd get it.
I ****ing love my job,best I've ever had,main reason for that?hard fought for pay and conditions by my trade union.
I don't own this job,I'm just a custodian of it,I'm doing my best to look after it for tube drivers that aren't even born yet.
Don't be envious,aspire.
Ok. If I my company told me I had to relocate to Mumbai, for example, I would quit. As I say, negotiations should (and I'm sure will) include caps on how many night shifts someone will be asked to do.
Very much this (apart from the cruise ship bits )Just wish we had a union that stood up for us like they have. As a seafarer on a Bahamas registered ship under American ownership, you pretty much have zero rights.
Their attitude is "If you don't like it, there are plenty of other people who will take your job".
If only we had someone like the late Bob Crow. Be good to see a cruise ship unable to sail because of the crew protesting about their pay & conditions.
Don't get me wrong, my salary is ok, (although I breach Maritime Labor Law every week with the amount of hours I do) but the regular crew from say, Philippines, Caribbean, Indonesia, Nicaragua etc. 8-10 month contracts working every day then maximum of 2 months off before coming back. Don't know how they do it.
Up the workers!
You really don't understand do you. This is TfL testing the water. More night shifts will be in their thoughts. As it is I am a train Driver and work more than my fair share of night shifts, usually 7 in a row every three or four weeks. It's a killer, made even worse when you don't have a rostered Sunday ovetime shift in the middle so that you are effectively trying to maintain a sleep pattern when you are at home. Our management don't give two hoots about that....they're tucked up in bed every night. I am firmly behind the Tube Drivers on this. You have to protect your working conditions, nobody else will.
Don't ask me. Ask the guy who said I was a banker.
99% of people on NSC would take one of these jobs if offered .What's a banker out of interest ? The cashier in your local branch on 20k a year getting hammered daily for not meeting sales targets and doing loads of unpaid overtime ? The ops person doing long shifts in tiny cubicle in a dingy office on the arse-end of an industrial estate for less than that ? Like it or not these types form a large % of the millions of employees in the industry in the UK, not the relatively small % of selfish (massively overpaid) goons with their noses in the trough who were allowed to mess things up so very badly..........
I support the unions looking to limit the numbers of night shifts, though I really disagree with the way they've gone about it. It's also been pointed out that current working hours are 4.45am to 1.30am so it's not quite as drastic a change as people imagine
I support the unions looking to limit the numbers of night shifts, though I really disagree with the way they've gone about it. It's also been pointed out that current working hours are 4.45am to 1.30am so it's not quite as drastic a change as people imagine
Cracking debating skills there Nibble. You've really won the argument. What is it about the left who resort to name calling during a perfectly reasonable debate. It's a bit sadClueless.
Cracking debating skills there Nibble. You've really won the argument. What is it about the left who resort to name calling during a perfectly reasonable debate. It's a bit sad
More like you disagree with my points so you refer to it as drivel. It's patheticYou've been posting on this thread for some time now. I've put forward very reasoned arguments as has everyone else and you keep coming out with inaccurate drivel. I'm at the stage where I believe you are clueless. Hence the post. It's not personal, nor is it a name, it's an adjective.
More like you disagree with my points so you refer to it as drivel. It's pathetic