Worthai Seagull
Wenners
...Jimmy Greaves summed it up at half time when he said that the guys from the 1966 World Cup team could turn out now and beat them !!
Absolutely not !!! Whats the point? Its not even like you can can use a game like that as a practice game to try out different tactics cos you will never play a team as shit as that in the World/European cup finals... No point whatsoever !!!!!!!
I like Lawrenson's idea. Put all these shit teams (Andorra, Faroe Islands, San Marino, Armenia, Lichtenstein etc) together in one group.
Let them play against each other, so at least they get the chance to occasionally play a competitive game.
Then let the winner of the group play a 2 leg playoff against one of the other group runners up (where they WILL come up against proper strong opposition) for a place in the finals.
I mean, in other parts of the world that's what happens, CONCACAF, for example where you get shit footie like Canada v Costa Rica, they get a competitive game but will never progress much further.
I like Lawrenson's idea. Put all these shit teams (Andorra, Faroe Islands, San Marino, Armenia, Lichtenstein etc) together in one group.
Let them play against each other, so at least they get the chance to occasionally play a competitive game.
Then let the winner of the group play a 2 leg playoff against one of the other group runners up (where they WILL come up against proper strong opposition) for a place in the finals.
I mean, in other parts of the world that's what happens, CONCACAF, for example where you get shit footie like Canada v Costa Rica, they get a competitive game but will never progress much further.
I like Lawrenson's idea. Put all these shit teams (Andorra, Faroe Islands, San Marino, Armenia, Lichtenstein etc) together in one group.
Let them play against each other, so at least they get the chance to occasionally play a competitive game.
Then let the winner of the group play a 2 leg playoff against one of the other group runners up (where they WILL come up against proper strong opposition) for a place in the finals.
I mean, in other parts of the world that's what happens, CONCACAF, for example where you get shit footie like Canada v Costa Rica, they get a competitive game but will never progress much further.
hows Andorra playing San Marino more competitive than what they have played tonight ??
:utterCock:
of course they should, they are a nation. its like saying whats the point of football outside the premiership.
so, you think Andorra competed tonight, Redcock? Interesting theory.
would you say the same if the FA Cup became a top one or even top two division league competition
In the FA cup, the shit teams all play each other first before getting to the latter stages. You wont get Eastbourne Borough drawn against any of the top 5 in the first week of the competition so thats not a fair comparison.
Then let the winner of the group play a 2 leg playoff against one of the other group runners up (where they WILL come up against proper strong opposition) for a place in the finals.
I mean, in other parts of the world that's what happens, CONCACAF, for example where you get shit footie like Canada v Costa Rica, they get a competitive game but will never progress much further.
CONCACAF, for example where you get shit footie like Canada v Costa Rica, they get a competitive game but will never progress much further.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I'm aware, the first teams that go into the "hat" in the early stages of the FA cup are the lower tier teams. I presume that this system is in place to prevent the higher tier teams playing too many "nothing" games when they already have enough important games to play. And its only in the latter stages that the higher tier teams go into the "hat" with the best of the lower tier teams therefore making sure that the competition is both fair and relevant.