LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Yes. Clueless prick.
Looking in the mirror again
Yes. Clueless prick.
Why Eddie Howe though?? He’s just been relegated!! Wtf are some of you smoking?
He’s not a prick, not sure he’s clueless either, he is regretfully well out of his depth though[emoji106]
Why Eddie Howe though?? He’s just been relegated!! Wtf are some of you smoking?
But who replaces him
I have been a Potter supporter but unfortunately now feel we may need a change - we have lots of technically gifted players but no sparkle, creativity or oomph so something has to change
A team struggling to score goals struggles to beat another struggling team in a game at the bottom of the table where losing is the worst outcome for both. I am not surpsied at todays game - genuinely.. we all knew it was going to be horrible, even those who want GP "out" apparently, knew what kind of game it was going to be. Once it went to 11 v 10 it was only going to get worse unless we scored 1st. If GP is asked to put a side out, that creates some chances, not just half-chances to give us the chance to win a match, he has done that. I don't put this on him - players playing for their places, their futures need to take chances such as they missed today and have done all season.. I didn't see anything that was tactically naive or not understandable. He made changes, tried different combinations, one of which scored and one of which should have won it at the end. At some point the players need to realise their time is running out and do something themselves about it..
A team struggling to score goals struggles to beat another struggling team in a game at the bottom of the table where losing is the worst outcome for both. I am not surpsied at todays game - genuinely.. we all knew it was going to be horrible, even those who want GP "out" apparently, knew what kind of game it was going to be. Once it went to 11 v 10 it was only going to get worse unless we scored 1st. If GP is asked to put a side out, that creates some chances, not just half-chances to give us the chance to win a match, he has done that. I don't put this on him - players playing for their places, their futures need to take chances such as they missed today and have done all season.. I didn't see anything that was tactically naive or not understandable. He made changes, tried different combinations, one of which scored and one of which should have won it at the end. At some point the players need to realise their time is running out and do something themselves about it..
But who replaces him