Should Forster and Murray start tonight?

[algie]

Or do you keep the 4-5-1 system which nearly brought us a victory?

To be honest apart from the penalty we never looked liked scoring at Leeds but certainly looked hard to break down.
I would go with two up front from the start.

 

[sam86]

4-5-1.

 

[Rookie]

Murray seemed to play well up top on his own so why change it

 

[Simon Morgan]

I think maybe start with 4-5-1 but definitely bring Forster on after about an hour if needed.

 

[DIFFBROOK]

4-5-1 to start off with. If we go behind, then bring Forster on. If not wait until around 60 mins and then bring him on.

 

[algie]

The only thing that concerns me is Murray and his fitness.He ran his socks off at Leeds on his own and to expect him to do it again a couple of days later is a big ask.

 

[deletebeepbeepbeep]

4-5-1 and unleash Forster on Exeter this Saturday!

 

[The Wizard]

Brezvan

Inigo
Elphick
Bomber
Painter

Bennett
Dicker
Navarro
Crofts
Lua Lua

Murray

 

[Mellotron]

The only thing that concerns me is Murray and his fitness.He ran his socks off at Leeds on his own and to expect him to do it again a couple of days later is a big ask.

I think for that reason we will see subs around 60-70mins in the striking area, regardless of scoreline at the time.

 

[brightonmad999]

i reckon if we played well at leeds with the 4-5-1 we should keep it and then we can changed it if we need to and if we are chaseing the game

 

[severnside gull]

i reckon if we played well at leeds with the 4-5-1 we should keep it and then we can changed it if we need to and if we are chasing the game

 

[fleet]

I agree with whatever Gus does

 

[PHCgull]

I agree with whatever Gus does

what he said. It's good to be tactically unpredictable

 

[Laughing Gravy]

I am sure he will start 4 5 1 Then we shall see

 

[BensGrandad]

I see no reason to change the formation. If we go behind then perhaps to chase the game but until then stick with 4 - 5- 1. At least if we keep a clean sheet we get a point.

 

[Perkino]

Why do people think that starting with a 4-5-1 is a good idea if they then say we should change to 4-4-2 if we go a goal behind to get us back into the game.

If 4-4-2 is better for us to score then why not start with that formation?

 

[The Oldman]

If I was Gus I would start with 4-4-2 as I expext Charlton will be expecting us to play as we did at Leeds. When we go a goal up then change to 4-5-1, but I'm not Gus so who knows?

 

[hans kraay fan club]

..............Brvzvzvn............

Painter, El ABd, Elphick, Caldo.

.......Dicker, Navarro, Crofts....
Bennett......................LuaLua
................Murray.................

 

[BensGrandad]

Why do people think that starting with a 4-5-1 is a good idea if they then say we should change to 4-4-2 if we go a goal behind to get us back into the game.

If 4-4-2 is better for us to score then why not start with that formation?

Because a 4-5-1 formation is tighter and less chance of us conceeding a goal which means we get a draw.

If we do go behind we then have to come out more and attack to get one back and invariably Gus brings on at least one more forward if we are losing usually replacing a defender.

 

[Driver8]

The 4-5-1 did really well 2nd half Saturday. I think we should play the same and if Murray tires replace him with Forster who is quite capable of playing lone striker role.