Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Should clubs get compensation?



Wilka

Well-known member
Nov 18, 2003
3,703
Burgess Hill
Uefa fears for international game

International football will be destroyed if Belgian club Charleroi win a landmark court case, says European football's governing body Uefa.

Charleroi are suing world body Fifa after player Abdelmajid Oulmers was injured playing for Morocco in 2004.

Few countries could fund national teams if Charleroi won, Uefa told BBC Sport.

A spokesman said: "It would be the end of the national team game. A World Cup would take place with only Spain, Germany, Italy, France and England."

A Charleroi victory would mean clubs would become entitled to compensation while their players are away on international duty

The spokesman, William Gaillard, said international football was "in the end what people like the most".

"If you ask the English fans if they would like to see one English club win the Champions League or England win a championship, then I think you know the answer," he said.

Charleroi claim the loss of Oulmers damaged their hopes of winning the Belgian league title in 2004/5 and it wants compensation for having to pay the player's wages while he was out of action.

In May, the case was moved from a tribunal in Charleroi to the European Court of Justice, where it is waiting to be heard.

The club are being backed by the G14 group of clubs, who are unhappy with Fifa rules that players must be released for international football without entitlement to financial compensation.

A Charleroi victory "would be the end of national football for any football association outside of the big five in Europe," Gaillard said.

"I was talking to Brazilian, Scandinavian and Eastern European football experts, and they all said we would never see our stars playing for the national team again.

"A World Cup would take place with only Spain, Germany, Italy, France and England and that would be the end.

"Recently the head of the Irish FA said if we have to pay for our stars we would never see Robbie Keane playing for Ireland again.

"There's no way the Brazilian FA could pay for one fifth of the players."

Newcastle are negotiating with the Football Association for compensation after Michael Owen was injured playing for England during the World Cup.

The FA has one of the most progressive insurance policies in world football, offering to pay the wages of players for up to two years after they suffer injury.

The sums involved are reported to be capped at £55,000 a week.

Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger this week weighed into the debate by likening international coaches to joyriders.

"What the national coaches are doing is like taking the car from his (club manager's) garage without even asking his permission," Wenger said.

"They'll then use his car for 10 days and abandon it in a field without any petrol left in the tank.

"We then have to recover it, but it is broken down. Then, a month later, they'll come to take your car again -and for good measure you're expected to be nice about it."
----------------

f*** off they should! If you sign a international player you should expect it! Money grabbing barstards!

:angry: :angry:
 






Statto

007
Nov 11, 2005
4,317
Graceland Memphis
Bloody hell lets hope they win. We would get to the semi finals of the world cup every year if they did.:D :jester:

All joking aside this could be tragic for football.
 
Last edited:


Cocksucker Blue

New member
Sep 3, 2006
212
Clubs dont own the player do they. England should have asked for compensation when United presented Rooney with a buggered foot pre-World Cup.
 


Charles 'Charley' Charles

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2005
3,571
The Mile Of Oaks
Yes if the player was brought through the youth and/or became an international whilst at the club.

A definate no if a club buys a player who is already an international, you knew he was an international class player, thats why you bought him.
 




Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,323
Living In a Box
555kaz said:
Yes if the player was brought through the youth and/or became an international whilst at the club.

A definate no if a club buys a player who is already an international, you knew he was an international class player, thats why you bought him.

Agreed
 


Seagull Stew

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2003
1,416
Brighton
It's about time the money makers in this great sport realised football's roots are all important and without it, football would not survive as a business.

Every club abides by the rules of it's country's own governing body and then to the continent's body (IE UEFA) and ultimately to the overall body FIFA.

These organisations create the competitions and therefore the fixtures for clubs to play in, generating the income that the plc companies behind them receive, through advertising revenue, Television, gate receipts, merchandise.

They also create competitions between national sides and need to protect the right of any country to play their best players regardless of who pays their wages.

It's time for FIFA to say that International football is not a new phenomenon, it's been around for almost as long as club football (in this country anyway) has been and both have managed to co-exist for around 100 years.

In cricket, counties who have international players who are on tour with their country simply can't pick them, end of. I'm not suggesting football has that attitude but clubs need to realise that they don't own their players, the sport itself does.

To Charleroi, or to any other club that decides to take FIFA to court over matters like this, FIFA should say, "Fine. Take us to court. But you are no longer invited to take part in any of our competitions."

See how far that gets them!
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here