Keep going you are really showing yourself as a plank which sadly is very tame as to what you really are
Actually, no. But keep up your delusions.
Again, 'night 'night - way past your beddy-bies time.
Keep going you are really showing yourself as a plank which sadly is very tame as to what you really are
well if its not a christian orientated country what is it
regards
DR
Well, how about for a start, not a Muslim!
No, I don't think you would. Your belief systems, whatever they are, are too firmly entrenched to consider any others.
What?
Somehow I doubt that. Sleep on.
I'll agree on that. But so many seem to use this phrase, but none seem to provide an explanation for it.
We are not a Muslim country, and until someone explains why we are 'Christian' I don't see us as that either.
I would suggest 'secular' is probably the best generic description of summary.
There are many examples of the relationship between the established Church and the State.
Archbishops and bishops are appointed by The Queen on the advice of the Prime Minister, who considers the names selected by a Church Commission. They take an oath of allegiance to The Queen on appointment and may not resign without Royal authority.
you seem to be advocating state sponsored assasination based on suspicion. killing dozens of people for mere talk and bravado in most cases. are you sure? im not sure those you want to carry this out signed up for that either, not in our green fields at least. im becoming disappointed by views like this, especially by those not usually hard right/racists. its seems they the terrorists and jihadis are winning the propaganda war, if we suspend process of law we've lost.
Millions of people living in fear of the special forces or secret police? Get real. A few hundred at most, and so they fvcking well should. Better that that millions of people living in fear of a handful of Islamic nutters hiding in plain sight.
When the worst happens there are two types of people: those who run towards it and those who run away.
a person that follows or holds values in the christian beliefs and preachings, what else do you want me to say, if you have a better description tell usYou're not answering my question. And you are not the first. Even 'Christian Orientated' tells me that you are saying that we are of, and guided by, our devotion to Christianity.
So we return to the question. What do you mean by Christian ?
Your examples are based upon mere observation of tradition and ceremony, not the cultural semantics of the phrase.
Using the phrase 'God' in an anthem, or having my diary list the days of saints, is meaningless unless there is a more than a passive observation to this ritual. The phrase 'Christian Country' is at best latent if it refers to some sort of iconicalism- of which few really have active participation in, or even know, its proper narrative.
So, if we are a 'Christian Country' the most relevant question is: What is a Christian ?
To be honest, I'm quite happy for Christians to get on with their beliefs and for Muslims to get on with theirs too. When you're talking about extremists, it is such a tiny proportion of Muslims - about 0.001%.
Sorry but while these crimes are shocking they are shocking because they are rare here (no one bothers showing the latest Baghdad bombings on UK telly, did you know 46 people died in suicide bombings in Beirut on Thursday?). I want to live in a liberal social, secular democracy and the clowns who ordered these killings don't. If we suspend any single part of our rule of law they've won.
Using your logic, victims of muslim extremists would equally represent a tiny proportion of the overall population.
You should head to Paris and roll that argument out over there...........a kind of nothing to see here approach.
Bon chance.
Lord of the Hooligans, sage of football violence please tell us all the solution to this
I really don't understand the point that you're making, or why you're trying to twist my logic. My only comment was to say that the vast, vast majority of Muslims are not extremists (which is a pretty obvious point that you'd have to be a brainless moron to disagree with).
I really don't understand the point that you're making, or why you're trying to twist my logic. My only comment was to say that the vast, vast majority of Muslims are not extremists (which is a pretty obvious point that you'd have to be a brainless moron to disagree with).
Where did I disagree with your statement?
I am merely pointing out that the same logic equally applies to victims of Islamic extremists too.
It clearly follows however that by pointing out your analysis that only 0.0001% of Muslims represent a risk, then we should just carry on, no change needed anywhere...........or am I being a brainless moron?