If you are going to throw around assumptions then try not to embellish and put in false assumptions. I do not believe that most posters who have a view that does not fit your criteria have ever used the words "curry munchers" "ragheads" and "chinkies", the Sikhs amongst others wear the turban, is there a problem with the Sikhs in the UK and Europe, any problem with the Chinese....NO, no terrorism or special demands, no appeasement needed for these two or MANY other religions and races that have/are not causing terrorist acts. We have a problem with SOME and getting bigger, from a certain religion, perhaps to you it should not be mentioned, i think it should.
After a post like this i wonder who are the "retarded" and "bigoted posters" you mention
That at least is reassuring and I did actually think that what you say is indeed the case. As to your degree of complicity that of course would depend on what your actual support amounted to.
I can't help feeling that your last para is rather simplistic -if Al Q and their ilk are murdering others, then by this logic we just sit back and say we will not interfere in their business. So ISIS can rape and pillage their way through the Middle East and we should not get involved in their business? It really is not that simple.
I think the word "sympathy" was misleading. It is possible to understand the motivation without agreeing with it.
There were millions of people, not just Muslims, who were against the "illegal" war in Iraq, and the actions of Blair and Bush made the "illegal" the events of 7/7 highly likely.
The word sympathy sounds like it covers the point but it is inaccurate because I understand the motivation, and I am not Muslim.
China are responsible for just about every act of cyber terrorism which happens around the world. They are by far and away the biggest threat to international stability. .
From BBC website
"Paris is, predictably, in a febrile state. Reports of shooting in the suburb of Bagnolet spread online and a police helicopter was dispatched overhead. Police are now saying the noise was firecrackers set off by a wedding party. "
This point aside I'm surprised at how much of the media coverage of this terrible event is censored.
Last night images were largely restricted to police reactions and today some important mobile phone footage shown has been so heavily pixelated it's pointless. The media were recently prepared to provide uncensored images of a dead child being found on a beach in Turkey, so I would have thought that they would think that broadly the public could stomach more uncensored images of this tragedy.
Given the positive reaction of the public to the images of that poor child, I would have thought a consistent approach to news broadcasting could only help the public understand the nature of this tragedy.
China are responsible for just about every act of cyber terrorism which happens around the world*.
Senior figures in both Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the Palestinian territories have condemned the attacks in Paris.
Dr Bassem Naim, head of the Council of International Relations for Hamas, told AFP the group condemned “the acts of aggression and barbarity”, while Islamic Jihad condemned “a crime against innocents”.
My last paragraph referred to Al-Quaeda as my initial response (that has been questioned here) was referring to a point that was made about sympathy to the cause of the 7/7 attacks which clearly predate ISIS.
Things have obviously moved on now since the arrival of ISIS and from this we now have a new agenda to deal with, but please understand I am trying to add clarity to a point made by another poster about a previous event in a different time and climate.
I hope you understand now.
If you want to believe the supposed motivation of the terrorists go ahead. They seem to claim every cause as justification from Palestine to Iraq, Afghanistan, Infidel troops near Mecca, Blasphemy, establishing a Caliphate. I have no sympathy for this view.
You have completely missed the point, but while we are at it, what was our justification for going to war in Iraq and did you sympathise with it?
As far as acts of terrorism goes you should look up the King David Hotel bombing.
One of the gunmen at the theatre was 'known to the authorities.'
What a fvcking surprise. How many more times, before we round up these vermin?