- Apr 5, 2014
- 25,892
Just noticed that here. I thought Sheffield United had taken their full allocation.Just switched on for the second half. Ground appears to be virtually empty. WTF?
Just noticed that here. I thought Sheffield United had taken their full allocation.Just switched on for the second half. Ground appears to be virtually empty. WTF?
This game is definitely not hyping me up about tomorrow.Just switched on for the second half. Ground appears to be virtually empty. WTF?
Got the air of a pre-season friendly much of the time. Awful advert for the FA Cup and Wembley.This game is definitely not hyping me up about tomorrow.
Dire!! With no atmosphere.
Let's hope for the opposite tomorrow
More corporate "guests" than fans.This game is definitely not hyping me up about tomorrow.
Dire!! With no atmosphere.
Let's hope for the opposite tomorrow
There’s always someone that has to be devils advocate for the sake of it.Yep. This conspiracy stuff is tiresome and immature. VAR is not meant to re ref the game. At first I thought it was a penalty. Then I changed my mind. Then I changed it again. All irrelevant. The on field ref gave his decision and in the absence of 100% proof against that’s what counts. Pretty much the same system as used in cricket. I don’t like VAR but not because it doesn’t make the decisions I think should be made. I’m not the ref.
The comparison to cricket (which you're obviously not the first to have made, but have lucked out as being the person I've decided to respond to. Congratulations)Yep. This conspiracy stuff is tiresome and immature. VAR is not meant to re ref the game. At first I thought it was a penalty. Then I changed my mind. Then I changed it again. All irrelevant. The on field ref gave his decision and in the absence of 100% proof against that’s what counts. Pretty much the same system as used in cricket. I don’t like VAR but not because it doesn’t make the decisions I think should be made. I’m not the ref.
I'm happy to be corrected on this if I'm wrong, but my understanding has always been that there's no actual basis for the idea that a tackle can't be a foul if the player gets the ball.There’s always someone that has to be devils advocate for the sake of it.
The whole ‘clear and obvious’ quote is tiresome, clear and obvious is open to interpretation, if a player getting the ball isn’t clear and obvious then what the hell is? A ball hitting someone’s hip not their hand? An offside line? A ball hitting someone’s shoulder and being ruled hand ball?
No actual basis written down - but a well understood and established precedent over 100+ years really. If you get the ball first, it should only really be a foul if it's dangerous play at the same time.I'm happy to be corrected on this if I'm wrong, but my understanding has always been that there's no actual basis for the idea that a tackle can't be a foul if the player gets the ball.
Only tend to hear their fans when they're several goals up. Or screaming for penaltiesI HATE the muted celebrations from City. “Hooray another one”
Yeah, but a decision's never going to be overturned based on something that isn't in the rules.No actual basis written down - but a well understood and established precedent over 100+ years really. If you get the ball first, it should only really be a foul if it's dangerous play at the same time.