Shaking hands before match

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊







Goring-by-Seagull

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2012
1,981
It's just for the sportsmanship side of football. So I think it's important.

It should never be an issue. There must be lots of players who hate other players but still shake their hands before games.. The only times they don't shake (ie Suarez/Evra Bridge/Terry) is when there's a big public hoo-hah about it all and they're not shaking to show off to the media and they know all eyes are on them.
 




One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 4, 2006
23,001
Worthing
Pointless. Organised football has been played for well over a 100 years without the need for a pre-match handshake. At times players look embarassed by it and its more of a touching (similar to a 'high 5'), than a handshake. By the mere fact of it being in place, it has magnified some poor unsportsmanlike behaviour by Suarez and arguably Ferdinand also.

I am all for shaking ahnds at the final whistle and if a player doesn't want to they have the choice of walking off the pitch.
 


Feb 14, 2010
4,932
No, I dont see the point of the handshake before the game, it should be after the game. But we should now do it because to get rid of it will be giving in to people that cant behave themselves, just like we have to have a minutes applause because society gave into people that cant behave themselves... and we wonder why crime is as it is.
 
















TS90

New member
Jan 26, 2011
818
Pointless shaking hands at the beginning - if it's for sportmanship purposes, shaking hands at the end would be far better.

Which is the time where it's entirely optional. Shows how backwards the sport's governing bodies are.
 




Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
I'd like to know why they cancelled the handshakes when it involved Terry as it could have been controversial and yet didn't do the same for yesterday's game when it was just as controversial?
 


BensGrandad

New member
Jul 13, 2003
72,015
Haywards Heath
I think that it was a stupid idea in the fir.st place that served no useful purpose. It has now developed into a matter that is now open to abuse and causes problems. It would serve a better purpose to do it after the game as to say that is the match finished with anything that has happened or been said is now finished and stays on the pitch.

A lot has been said about Saurez refusing to shake Evras hand but nothing about Ferdinand or Welbeck not shaking his hand, its all one sided.
 






pasty

A different kind of pasty
Jul 5, 2003
31,040
West, West, West Sussex
I'd like to know why they cancelled the handshakes when it involved Terry as it could have been controversial and yet didn't do the same for yesterday's game when it was just as controversial?

Chelsea QPR was an FA Cup match and I think it was the FA that suggested foregoing the handshake routine. The Premier League yesterday, didn't.
 


clippedgull

Hotdogs, extra onions
Aug 11, 2003
20,789
Near Ducks, Geese, and Seagulls
I'd like to know why they cancelled the handshakes when it involved Terry as it could have been controversial and yet didn't do the same for yesterday's game when it was just as controversial?

Simples.

Suarez promised that he would shake Evras hand.

Evra said that he would shake Suarezs hand.

FA relaxed and the rest is history.
 










Pointless shaking hands at the beginning - if it's for sportmanship purposes, shaking hands at the end would be far better.

in the olden days true sportsmen would have a handshake in the tunnel on the way out where it was often not seen, for their benefit, not on the pitch for the benefit of Sky.

when I was kid we never shook hands after the match, but the captain would make us give "3 cheers for Hollingbury Hawks (or whoever) Hip Hip......" (we never did this against Melford as they were wankers (you can't beat holding a grudge for 30 years!))
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top