To be honest I think women have let their rights go to their heads a bit, they all seem to be very mouthy and bad attitudey nowadays, just saying
To be honest there is a simple one word answer F-R-U-S-T-R-A-T-E-D.
To be honest I think women have let their rights go to their heads a bit, they all seem to be very mouthy and bad attitudey nowadays, just saying
Hmm I have been single for a few weeks now..To be honest there is a simple one word answer F-R-U-S-T-R-A-T-E-D.
and a bit of chat about 'sweater meat' the other day and your sincerity seems a little shallow.
If [MENTION=5707]Nibble[/MENTION] did use that phrase then his pious outburst on this thread does seem a bit hypocritical.
What does 'sweater meat' mean ?Well Nibble you little tinker, you sound sincere....but a bit of woooshing earlier and a bit of chat about 'sweater meat' the other day and your sincerity seems a little shallow.
What does 'sweater meat' mean ?
Alexander Carter-Silk is sent a connection request by Charlotte Proudman (for her own benefit, given that he is a solicitor and therefore capable of sending her work) in which he (stupidly and unnecessarily) complements her on a photo: she finds that objectifying and offensive, so publishes it to the world, claiming that his behaviour was not simply inappropriate flirtation but outright misogyny. She has blown it out of all proportion. A short message stating 'I am on LinkedIn for business purposes and would prefer to avoid comments about my appearance' would have been a much more measured response. Or you know, she could have just removed the bloody connection.
Wobblers
Assuming that last point was aimed at my comments, I have zero sympathy for the guy. My gut instinct is he's known for being a bit of a sleazebag and this isn't his first offence so to speak. Equally, he might be a perfectly well to do respectable type who logged on after a few pints at lunchtime and will likely lose his job and possibly his marriage through all this, which I don't think anyone deserves if it's just a mad moment.
If he'd said "I'd love to give you a good rogering" or words to that effect then yeah fair game, out him. As it stands, it's hard to judge because his comments were worded under a guise of politeness even if LinkedIn isn't the right place to do it.
I don't feel sorry for him in his £500 + per hour job. On that wage he shouldn't be making stupid mistakes. He looks like a right arogant creep in his photo.
More like £300/hour for a partner in a Solicitors firm. Barristers £600/hour plus. Ironic that you've just made a comment on his photo, as he did on hers. Which is more offensive?
Given that the majority of her tweets prior to the incident related to feminist issues, including using the hashtag #radicalfeminism, I'd say that she would've been absolutely delighted to have finally received something that made her a victim of so-called sexism.The picture of their private email conversation that she then published onto Twitter for the world to see shows that he replied at 09.16hrs a.m yesterday - i.e. stone cold sober.
She said in interview with the BBC that she replied "within minutes" but again, the Twitter picture shows her reply was at 17.58pm yesterday, so at the end of her working day when she'd had almost 9 hours to canvas opinion among friends and weigh up the pros and cons of the opportunity that had fallen into her lap.
This woman is a nasty piece of work.