Sergio Aguero - no punishment.

[Questions]

No retrospective acion because the ref saw the incident and dealt with it there and then. Phew.... Thank god he never got away with it. When done Chris Foy for seeing it and dealing with it.

 

[Richy_Seagull]

The rule is a complete farce.

 

[Sussex Nomad]

Barnes gets a retrospective ban, even though the ref had dealt with it... that works then.

 

[Conkers]

Barnes gets a retrospective ban, even though the ref had dealt with it... that works then.

Yes, but the ref gave the harshest penalty he could at the time with Barnes (red card) so they could add on extra if they wanted.

 

[Smithy]

Surely the ref didn't see the full incident. He would surely have sent him off if he had. Wouldn't he?

 

[Sussex Nomad]

Yes, but the ref gave the harshest penalty he could at the time with Barnes (red card) so they could add on extra if they wanted.

So what did Aguero get for stamping on someone?

 

[albion534]

The f.a are a joke

 

[Del Boy]

Shocking decision. Imagine if it had been Barton or Suarez

 

[We've signed Kanchelskis!]

Only happy about this as it was the same decision for Callum McManaman - quite obviously the rule should be changed

 

[ThePolishJig]

Apparently David Luiz was quoted saying " The reason brazil win more trophies than Argentina, because Argentina have players like Aguero"

 

[Driver8]

If the ref saw it and thought he had dealt with it then HE should be punished.

 

[BensGrandad]

It seems that the rule needs changing to allow the FA to take action if they considered the refs action wasn't appropriate the trouble is it would be seen as to undermine the refs.