Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Sepp Blatter - a tragedy
- Thread starter severnside gull
- Start date
Nathan
Well-known member
- Jan 8, 2010
- 3,790
What about the Harry hill way of doing things...Who should be the winner? There's only one way to found out FIGHT!!!!!
Or if you wanted to be sensible, why not look at the disciplinary record of the teams in the match and the team with the least cards in that game wins. If cards are the same it goes back to the previous game. If still the same, then er, just go to pens - its great entertainment.
Or if you wanted to be sensible, why not look at the disciplinary record of the teams in the match and the team with the least cards in that game wins. If cards are the same it goes back to the previous game. If still the same, then er, just go to pens - its great entertainment.
User removed 4
New member
Isnt he swiss ?
The NSC retards don't let that get in the way of a good moan.
Don't say that bushy! There are a couple of NSCers here enjoying their chance to act like bin dippers.
Sussex Nomad
Well-known member
Which is of course, far too sensible.
Or do it on time spent in the others half to decide, most shots on goal to decide, anything from the stats that may be used and all available. Maybe a 'point' for hitting the post/crossbar... there are other alternatives to take away pens. However the pens before the extra time starts makes sense to me.
Woodchip
It's all about the bikes
I was scared he was going to perform a Bee Gees song at the euros.
gripper stebson
Well-known member
- Jul 27, 2004
- 6,691
I reckon play on after 90 minutes but every five minutes the manager has to take a player off. Less and less players on the pitch would certainly lead to a goal pretty soonish.
But would you take off defenders or attackers?
Would be very entertaining!
But would you take off defenders or attackers?
Would be very entertaining!
skipper734
Registered ruffian
Switzerland is the Axis of Evil. You can be German Swiss, Italian Swiss or French and probably a few Austrian just to make sure. 
Superphil
Dismember
Why not arrange another game, a coupe of days later and call it a REPLAY, then see if someone gets the upper hand. Perhaps at the time of the REPLAY toss a coin pre-match, and then keep the result [of the coin toss] secret till the end of extra time, if it's still a draw, then the coin toss has it.
SK1NT
Well-known member
This is actually a good idea...
however can;t see pens going... I like the excitement of pens... what an anti climax to a game if it is decided on cards or number of shots.
NickBHAFC18
New member
Crossbar challenge to decide.
Stinky Pete
New member
As a kid, my team won a 3rd place playoff in a 6 a side tournament on corners won.
Personally I quite like penalties everyone knows where they stand with them. But corners would encourage attacking football instead of the negative play for penno's attitude.
Personally I quite like penalties everyone knows where they stand with them. But corners would encourage attacking football instead of the negative play for penno's attitude.
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
[MENTION=451]BensGrandad[/MENTION] nailed it earlier, and its an idea I've heard before.
You have the penalty shootout at the end of 90 minutes. The losing team then goes into ET knowing they HAVE to score in order to wipe out the penalty shootout result and win the game.
Imagine winning the shootout and going into ET knowing you just need to hold out as the other team takes to the field to BATTER you for 30 minutes, risking the chance of a goal on the break which would kill them dead (as they'd obviously then need 2 goals).
Its flawless. You're still retaining the drama of the penalty shootout, and having the extra time with a twist. No gimmicks, no boring stats deciding things, no ridiculous footballing circus of removing players. All you're doing is bumping the pens from after 120 to after 90 to give a whole new way of deciding it fairly.
I want it. I want it NOW.
You have the penalty shootout at the end of 90 minutes. The losing team then goes into ET knowing they HAVE to score in order to wipe out the penalty shootout result and win the game.
Imagine winning the shootout and going into ET knowing you just need to hold out as the other team takes to the field to BATTER you for 30 minutes, risking the chance of a goal on the break which would kill them dead (as they'd obviously then need 2 goals).
Its flawless. You're still retaining the drama of the penalty shootout, and having the extra time with a twist. No gimmicks, no boring stats deciding things, no ridiculous footballing circus of removing players. All you're doing is bumping the pens from after 120 to after 90 to give a whole new way of deciding it fairly.
I want it. I want it NOW.
SurreySeagulls
Well-known member
How about on the cummulative size of the players manhoods. This way an African side would finally win a world and keep up Pele's prediction. And for women we can go for the cummulative cup sizes, would mean most Asian team wouldn't win though but would normally mean Sweden winning everything
Hillian1
( . ) ( . )
This would be pure brilliance.
I'm not entirely convinced. One of the beauties of the penalty shoot out after 120 mins is that a PLUCKY minnow can hold out for 120 mins and nick a tie in the shootout. If the shootout is played before the final 30 mins with the minnow losing it, then their only available game plan of not conceding a goal will be entirely useless.