Sending off.

[clapham_gull]

Wasn't there but just seen this on a wolves forum. Looked conclusive on the telly, but this still makes it look very 50/50..

https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=919593044776308&set=p.919593044776308&type=1&theater

We've seen a few of these over the years, the player not getting sent off the one injured.

From the television, I think the ref make the right decision - but the margins are so low. Virgo correctly commented that it wouldn't have been a sending off ten years ago.

 

[Bladders]

That photo is so misleading . Who plays the ball on the outside if their foot ffs?

He missed the ball and slid through off the ground through Rosenior.


****ing Northern monkeys no **** all about the game, silly beggars.

 

[nwgull]

That shot certainly makes it look 50/50; the actual video footage can add a bit of context though: angle and pace of tackle etc.

 

[Bladders]

That shot certainly makes it look 50/50; the actual video footage can add a bit of context though: angle and pace of tackle etc.

No It doesn't, it clearly shows he's through early and takes the player.

The ball is almost at his heel on the outside of his foot.

 

[RM-Taylor]

From where we were stood it looked a dangerous lunge by the player. Wonder what the Wolves fans who were in the Steve Bull upper thought as they would have seen the same as we did.

 

[clapham_gull]

I totally agree with all of the above, but the point I was making was about the low margins on these challenges this days. A few centimetres, a twist of the foot and it goes the other way.

 

[Megazone]

Coady's foot ended on the shin of Rosenoir. The follow-through was far too aggressive. Definitely should have seen red.

 

[timco]

Even the local media think it was a deserved red.

 

[Shropshire Seagull]

Good luck appealing that ....

The fact that none of he Wolves staff have even suggested an appeal speaks volumes.

 

[nwgull]

No It doesn't, it clearly shows he's through early and takes the player.

The ball is almost at his heel on the outside of his foot.

In you post before mine you've stated 'the photo is so misleading'. That means that you agree with me, doesn't it?

 

[Vegas Seagull]

Cowards tackle

 

[Exile]

Virgo correctly commented that it wouldn't have been a sending off ten years ago.

completely irrelevant crap punditry, tbh.

 

[Spanish Seagulls]

completely irrelevant crap punditry, tbh.

Virgo really has got a face for radio, scruffy git needs a shave too. Bad enough listening to him but when he is on TV it's worse.

 

[skipper734]

The Ref. was close and at the right angle. He had the card out before Coady had stopped sliding. QED.

 

[trueblue]

Red card all day long. Studs up and over the ball. I'm surprised people even think it's marginal.

 

[Seasider78]

Looked a red in realtime replays just reinforce that. Honestly have no idea what they are complaining about studs up, with force, missed ball, caught player a clear red

 

[Hampster Gull]

Dirty Wolves

 

[BensGrandad]

Wasn't there but just seen this on a wolves forum. Looked conclusive on the telly, but this still makes it look very 50/50..

https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=919593044776308&set=p.919593044776308&type=1&theater
Virgo correctly commented that it wouldn't have been a sending off ten years ago.

You conveniently forget all of his comment that in modern day football (and trying to cut out foul play) it was a justified red card

 

[Ali_rrr]

Was watching on a stream and I immediately thought it was a red.

 

[Beach Hut]

It was a definite red card, referee was straight in there and as stated no complaints from Wolves manager just their whinging fans