theboybilly
Well-known member
On transfermarket he is only valued at £3.4m
Is this really where you get your ideas from?
On transfermarket he is only valued at £3.4m
The site that valued Ankergren at £165k last year [emoji38]ol:On transfermarket he is only valued at £3.4m
Torres? I think someone has been at the acid again, the LSD variety obviously.
I don't know the exact time, but it was pre 2015.What time did you start on the sauce?
Leeds REJECT £12million bid from Burnley
Leeds REJECT £12million bid from Burnley
Leeds REJECT £12million bid from Burnley
They will be preparing a £12,000,000.50 bid as we speak.
I think Barnes is good but I don't think he's a 12 million pound player. Leeds are said to want 20 to 30 million for Wood. That's laughable.And yet many on here think he is a donkey. They said the same about Barnes
And yet many on here think he is a donkey. They said the same about Barnes
Your post is the first one comparing Wood to a donkey, that I've read.
Don't Burnley know that he's League 1 standard at best?Leeds REJECT £12million bid from Burnley
And yet many on here think he is a donkey. They said the same about Barnes
an interesting theory.
Because Leeds want stupid money, Burnley have stupid money, and Woods pretty much fits Burnley's template that means what?... Chris Woods is good.
Or perhaps it means football finance is mentals.
Football finance may be mental, that has nothing to do with Wood and his abilities
It does if you're says:-
'see £12m not accepted means Wood is good'.
You tell me?Who said that?